FACTOID # 10: The total number of state executions in 2005 was 60: 19 in Texas and 41 elsewhere. The racial split was 19 Black and 41 White.
 
 Home   Statistics   States A-Z   Flags   Maps   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
 

FACTS & STATISTICS    Simple view

  1. Select states to view: (hold down Control key and click to select several)

     

     

    Compare:

     

     

  1. Select fact or statistic: (* = graphable)

     

     

     

  2. (OPTIONAL) Compare to statistic: (both need to be graphable)

     

     

     

  3. View result as:

     

       
(OR) SEARCH ALL encyclopedia, stats & forums:   

Health > Health Index (vs) Lifestyle > Best States to Live

VIEW DATA:   Comparison scatterplot  
Plot and variable details   Full screen   Printable version   
    Flags   Circles (same size)   Circles (by population)   Circles (by GDP)   Circles (by land area)  
35
Lifestyle > Best States to Live
16
-21 Health > Health Index 23

Move your mouse over the circles to view country names, and then click to view their profiles.
Note: It will take several minutes to draw this plot the first time you view it. After that all plots should appear much more quickly.
Strength of correlation (R squared): 0.621 (this correlation is potentially significant)

X Axis Y Axis
Variable: Health > Health Index Lifestyle > Best States to Live
Plot Display: Linear Logarithmic (base 10)
Definition: Health Index by state. "The Healthiest State designation is awarded based on 21 factors chosen from the year 2005 edition of our annual reference book, Health Care State Rankings. These factors reflect access to health care providers, affordability of health care and a generally healthy population. All 21 factors are the same as last year. The 21 factors were divided into two groups: those that are “negative� for which a high ranking would be considered bad for a state, and those that are “positive� for which a high ranking would be considered good for a state. Rates for each of the 21 factors were processed through a formula that measures how a state compares to the national average for a given category. The positive and negative nature of each factor was taken into account as part of the formula. Once these computations were made, the factors then were weighted (factors were weighted equally.) These weighted scores were then added together to get a state’s final score (“SUM� on the table above.) This way, states are assessed based on how they stack up against the national average. The end result is that the farther below the national average a state’s health ranking is, the lower (and less healthy) it ranks. The farther above the national average, the higher (and healthier) a state ranks." - Morgan Quitno Press Livability Index by state. "To determine a state's 'Livability Rating,' each state's rankings for 44 factors were averaged. The scale is 1 to 50, the higher the number, the better. Data used are for the most recent year in which comparable numbers are available from most states. All factors were given equal weight. States with no data available for a given category were ranked based only on the remaining factors. In our book, data are listed from highest to lowest. However, for purposes of this award, we inverted rankings for those factors we determined to be 'positive.' Thus the state with the highest median income in the book (ranking 1st) would be given a number 50 ranking for this award." - Morgan Quitno Press
Source: Morgan Quitno Press, 2005 Morgan Quitno Press, 2005
Correlations:
      More correlations »     More correlations »
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
© Copyright StateMaster.com 2003-2009. All Rights Reserved. Usage implies agreement with terms.