FACTOID # 16: In the 2000 Presidential Election, Texas gave Ralph Nader the 3rd highest popular vote count of any US state.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   States A-Z   Flags   Maps   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Patient safety

Patient safety is a relatively recent initiative in healthcare, emphasizing the reporting, analysis and prevention of medical error and adverse healthcare events. The frequency and magnitude of avoidable adverse events was not well known until the 1990s, when reports in several countries revealed a staggering number of patient injuries and deaths each year. Patient safety initiatives include application of lessons learned from business and industry, advancing technologies, education of providers and the public, and economic incentives. A large number of organizations internationally promote patient safety issues. Image File history File links Download high resolution version (1920x2860, 2921 KB) File links The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed): Surgery ... See also preventable medical errors In the United States medical error is estimated to result in 44,000 to 98,000 unnecessary deaths and 1,000,000 excess injuries each year. ... Adverse effect, in medicine, is an abnormal, harmful, undesired and/or unintended side-effect, although not necessarily unexpected, which is obtained as the result of a therapy or other medical intervention, such as drug/chemotherapy, physical therapy, surgery, medical procedure, use of a medical device, etc. ...

Contents

Prevalence of adverse events

Greek physician treating a patient, ca. 480-470 BC (Louvre Museum, Paris, France )

Unforeseen bad outcomes of medical treatment cause harm to patients; Greek healers knew this in the 4th Century B.C., when the Hippocratic Oath pledged to "prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone."[1] However, despite an increasing emphasis on the scientific basis of medical practice in Europe and the United States in the late 19th Century, data on adverse outcomes were hard to come by and the various studies commissioned collected mostly anecdotal events.[2] Image File history File linksMetadata Download high resolution version (900x845, 606 KB) Description fr: Médecin soignant un patient. ... Image File history File linksMetadata Download high resolution version (900x845, 606 KB) Description fr: Médecin soignant un patient. ... A twelfth-century Byzantine manuscript of the Oath in the form of a cross. ... Medicine is the science and art of maintaining andor restoring human health through the study, diagnosis, and treatment of patients. ...


In the United States, the public and the medical specialty of anesthesia were shocked in April 1982 by the ABC television program 20/20 entitled The Deep Sleep. Presenting accounts of anesthetic accidents, the producers stated that, every year, 6,000 Americans die or suffer brain damage related to these mishaps.[3] In 1983, the British Royal Society of Medicine and the Harvard Medical School jointly sponsored a symposium on anesthesia deaths and injuries, resulting in an agreement to share statistics and to conduct studies.[4] By 1984 the American Society of Anesthesiologists had established the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. The APSF marked the first use of the term "patient safety" in the name of professional reviewing organization.[5] Although anesthesiologists comprise only about 5% of physicians in the United States, anesthesiology became the leading medical specialty addressing issues of patient safety.[6] Likewise in Australia, the Australian Patient Safety Foundation was founded in 1989 for anesthesia error monitoring. Both organizations were soon expanded as the magnitude of the medical error crisis became known. Anesthesia or anaesthesia (see spelling differences) has traditionally meant the condition of having the perception of pain and other sensations blocked. ... The American Broadcasting Company (ABC) operates television and radio networks in the United States and is also shown on basic cable in Canada. ... 20/20 is an American television newsmagazine broadcast on ABC since June 6, 1978. ... The Logo and Coat of Arms of the Society. ... Harvard Medical School (HMS) is one of the graduate schools of Harvard University. ...


To Err is Human

In the United States, the full magnitude and impact of errors in health care was not appreciated until the 1990s, when several reports brought attention to this issue.[7][8] In 1999, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences released a report, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System.[9] The IOM called for a broad national effort to include establishment of a Center for Patient Safety, expanded reporting of adverse events, development of safety programs in health care organizations, and attention by regulators, health care purchasers, and professional societies. The majority of media attention, however, focused on the staggering statistics: from 44,000 to 98,000 preventable deaths annually due to medical error, 7,000 preventable deaths related to medication errors alone. Within 2 weeks of the report's release, Congress began hearings and President Clinton ordered a government-wide study of the feasibility of implementing the report's recommendations.[10] Initial criticisms of the methodology in the IOM estimates[11] focused on the statistical methods of amplifying low numbers of incidents in the pilot studies to the general population. However, subsequent reports emphasized the striking prevalence and consequences of medical error. In July 2004, Healthgrades, a leading health care ratings organization, published a study, Patient Safety in American Hospitals, concluding that there were over one million adverse events associated with Medicare hospitalizations during 2000-2002, resulting in up to 195,000 accidental deaths per year in American hospitals.[12] Image File history File links No higher resolution available. ... The Institute of Medicine, a part of the National Academy of Sciences, is an American organization whose purpose is to provide national advice on issues relating to biomedical science, medicine, and health (National Academy of Sciences, n. ... HealthGrades (NASDAQ: HGRD), incorporated in December 1995, provides objective ratings of hospitals, nursing homes and home health agencies in the United States. ... President Johnson signing the Medicare amendment. ...


The experience has been similar in other countries.[13]

  • Ten years after a groundbreaking Australian study revealed 18,000 annual deaths from medical errors,[14] Professor Bill Runicman, one of the study's authors and president of the Australian Patient Safety Foundation since its inception in 1989, reported himself a victim of a medical dosing error.[15]
  • The Department of Health Expert Group in June 2000 estimated that over 850,000 incidents harm National Health Service hospital patients in the United Kingdom each year. On average forty incidents a year contribute to patient deaths in each NHS institution.[16]
  • In 2004, the Canadian Adverse Events Study found that adverse events occurred in over 7% of hospital admissions, and estimated that 9,000 to 24,000 Canadians die annually after an avoidable medical error.[17]
  • These and other reports from New Zealand,[18] Denmark[19] and developing countries[20] have led the World Health Organization to estimate that one in ten persons receiving health care will suffer preventable harm.

, the information in this article describes the current English public health service. ...

Causes of health care errors

The simplest definition of a health care error is a preventable adverse effect of care, whether or not it is evident or harmful to the patient. A conservative average of both the Institute of Medicine and HealthGrades reports indicates that there have been between 400,000-1.2 million error-induced deaths during 1996 - 2006 in the United States. These casualties have been, in part, attributed to:[21][22] Adverse effect, in medicine, is an abnormal, harmful, undesired and/or unintended side-effect, although not necessarily unexpected, which is obtained as the result of a therapy or other medical intervention, such as drug/chemotherapy, physical therapy, surgery, medical procedure, use of a medical device, etc. ... The Institute of Medicine, a part of the National Academy of Sciences, is an American organization whose purpose is to provide national advice on issues relating to biomedical science, medicine, and health (National Academy of Sciences, n. ...

Human Factors
  • Variations in provider training & experience,[23][24] fatigue.[25][26][27]
  • Diverse patients, unfamiliar settings, time pressures.
  • Failure to acknowledge the prevalence and seriousness of medical errors.
Medical complexity
  • Complicated technologies, powerful drugs.
  • Intensive care, prolonged hospital stay.
System failures
  • Poor communication, unclear lines of authority of physicians, nurses, and other care providers.[24]
  • Complications increase as patient to nurse staffing ratio increases.[28]
  • Disconnected reporting systems within a hospital: fragmented systems in which numerous hand-offs of patients results in lack of coordination and errors.[29]
  • The impression that action is being taken by other groups within the institution.
  • Reliance on automated systems to prevent error.[30]
  • Not measuring patient safety initiatives to analyze contributory issues and identify improvement strategies.
  • Cost-cutting measures by hospitals in response to reimbursement cutbacks.[31]

Common misconceptions about adverse events are:

  • "Bad apples" or incompetent health care providers are a common cause. (Although human error is commonly an initiating event, the faulty process of delivering care invariably permits or compounds the harm, and is the focus of improvement.[22])
  • High risk procedures or medical specialties are responsible for most avoidable adverse events. (Although some mistakes, such as in surgery, are harder to conceal, errors occur in all levels of care.[22] Even though complex procedures entail more risk, adverse outcomes are not usually due to error, but to the severity of the condition being treated.).[24][32] However, USP has reported that medication errors during the course of a surgical procedure are three times more likely to cause harm to a patient than those occurring in other types of hospital care.[29])
  • If a patient experiences an adverse event during the process of care, an error has occurred. (Most medical care entails some level of risk, and there can be complications or side effects, even unforeseen ones, from the underlying condition or from the treatment itself.[33])

USP can be an abbreviation for one of several universities: In Cebu City, Philippines, see University of Southern Philippines; In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, see University of the Sciences in Philadelphia; In São Paulo, Brazil, see University of São Paulo; In Shiga prefecture, Japan, see University of Shiga Prefecture; or...

Initiatives in patient safety

Safety programs in industry

Aviation safety
In the United States, two organizations contribute to one of the world's lowest aviation accident rates.[34] Mandatory accident investigation is carried out by the National Transportation Safety Board, while the Aviation Safety Reporting System receives voluntary reports to identify deficiencies and provide data for planning improvements. The latter system is confidential and provides reports back to stakeholders without regulatory action. Similarities and contrasts have been noted between the "cultures of safety" in medicine and aviation.[35] Pilots and medical personnel operate in complex environments, interact with technology, and are subject to fatigue, stress, danger, and loss of life and prestige as a consequence of error.[36] Given the enviable record of aviation in accident prevention, a similar medical adverse event system would include both mandatory (for severe incidents) and voluntary non-punitive reporting, teamwork training, feedback on performance and an institutional commitment to data collection and analysis. The Patient Safety Reporting System (PSRS) is a program modeled upon the Aviation Safety Reporting System and developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to monitor patient safety through voluntary, confidential reports.[37]
Near-miss reporting
A near miss is an unplanned event that did not result in injury, illness, or damage - but had the potential to do so. Reporting of near misses by observers is an established error reduction technique in aviation, and has been extended to private industry, traffic safety and fire-rescue services with reductions in accidents and injury.[38] AORN, a US-based professional organization of perioperative registered nurses, has put in effect a voluntary near miss reporting system (SafetyNet[39] ), covering medication or transfusion reactions, communication or consent issues, wrong patient or procedures, communication breakdown or technology malfunctions. An analysis of incidents allows safety alerts to be issued to AORN members.
Limits of the industrial safety model
Unintended consequences may occur as improvements in safety are undertaken. It may not be possible to attain maximum safety goals in healthcare without adversely affecting patient care in other ways. An example is blood transfusion; in recent years, to reduce the risk of transmissible infection in the blood supply, donors with only a small probability of infection have been excluded. The result has been a critical shortage of blood for other lifesaving purposes, with a broad impact on patient care.[32] Application of high-reliability theory and normal accident theory can help predict the organizational consequences of implementing safety measures.[40]

Seal of the National Transportation Safety Board The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is a U.S. government independent organization responsible for investigation of accidents involving aviation, highway, marine, pipelines and railroads in the United States. ... The Aviation Safety Reporting System, or ASRS, is a voluntary system that allows pilots and other airplane crew members to anonymously report near misses and close calls in the interest of improving air safety. ... The term stakeholder has two distinct uses in the English language: The traditional usage, in law and notably gambling, a third party who temporarily holds money or property while its owner is still being determined. ... The United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is a government-run military veteran benefit system with Cabinet-level status. ... NASA Logo Listen to this article · (info) This audio file was created from the revision dated 2005-09-01, and does not reflect subsequent edits to the article. ... A near miss is an unplanned event that did not result in injury, illness, or damage - but had the potential to do so. ...

Technology in healthcare settings

Handwritten reports or notes, manual order entry, non-standard abbreviations and poor legibility lead to substantial errors and injuries, according to the 1999 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report.[9] The follow-up IOM report, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, advised rapid adoption of electronic patient records, electronic medication ordering, with computer- and internet-based information systems to support clinical decisions.[41] According to a study by RAND Health, the US healthcare system could save more than $81 billion annually, reduce adverse healthcare events and improve the quality of care if it were to widely adopt health information technology.[42] The most immediate barrier to widespread adoption of technology is cost: patients benefit from better health, and payers benefit from lower costs; however, hospitals pay in both higher costs for implementation and lower revenues due to reduced patient length of stay. Electronic patient chart of a health information system Health informatics or medical informatics is the intersection of information science, computer science and health care. ...

US medical groups' adoption of EHR (2005)

The Electronic health record (EHR), previously known as the Electronic medical record (EMR), reduces several types of errors, including those related to prescription drugs, to preventive care, and to tests and procedures.[43] Important features of modern EHR software include automatic drug-drug/drug-food interaction checks and allergy checks, standard drug dosages and patient education information, such as describing common side effects. Recurring alerts remind clinicians of intervals for preventive care and track referrals and test results. Clinical guidelines for disease management have a demonstrated benefit when accessible within the electronic record during the process of treating the patient.[44] Advances in health informatics and widespread adoption of interoperable electronic health records promise access to a patient's records at any health care site. A 2005 report noted that medical practices in the United States are encountering barriers to adopting an EHR system, such as training, costs and complexity, but the adoption rate continues to rise (see chart to right).[45] Since 2002, the National Health Service of the United Kingdom has placed emphasis on introducing computers into healthcare. As of 2005, one of the largest projects for a national EHR is by the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. The goal of the NHS is to have 60,000,000 patients with a centralized electronic health record by 2010. The plan involves a gradual roll-out commencing May 2006, providing general practices in England access to the National Programme for IT (NPfIT), the NHS component of which is known as the "Connecting for Health Programme".[46] However, recent surveys have shown physicians' deficiencies in understanding the patient safety features of the NPfIT-approved software.[47] Image File history File links Download high-resolution version (1332x1128, 15 KB) Summary I created this chart myself in Excel, using data from a journal article in Health Aff (Millwood). ... Image File history File links Download high-resolution version (1332x1128, 15 KB) Summary I created this chart myself in Excel, using data from a journal article in Health Aff (Millwood). ... Electronic health record (EHR) with image and document links. ... An electronic medical record (EMR) is a medical record in digital format. ... Electronic patient chart of a health information system Health informatics or medical informatics is the intersection of information science, computer science and health care. ... , the information in this article describes the current English public health service. ... , the information in this article describes the current English public health service. ... A general practitioner (GP) or family physician (FP) is a physician who provides primary care. ... The National Programme for IT (NPfIT) which is being delivered by the new Department of Health agency NHS Connecting for Health (CfH), is an initiative by the National Health Service in England to move towards an electronic care record for patients and to connect 30,000 GPs to 300 hospitals...


Prescribing errors are the largest identified source of preventable errors in hospitals. A 2006 report by the Institute of Medicine estimated that a hospitalized patient is exposed to a medication error each day of his or her stay.[48] Computer physician order entry (CPOE) reduces the medication error rate by 80%, and by 55% for errors with serious potential patient harm.[49] A 2004 survey by Leapfrog found that 16% of US clinics, hospitals and medical practices are expected to be utilizing CPOE within 2 years.[50] In addition to electronic prescribing, a standardized bar code system for dispensing drugs could prevent a quarter of drug errors.[48] Consumer information about the risks of the drugs and improved drug packaging (clear labels, avoiding similar drug names and dosage reminders) are other error-proofing measures. Despite ample evidence of the potential to reduce medication errors, competing systems of barcoding and electronic prescribing have slowed adoption of this technology by doctors and hospitals in the United States, due to concern with interoperability and compliance with future national standards.[51] Such concerns are not inconsequential; standards for electronic prescribing for Medicare Part D conflict with regulations in many US states.[48] Computer physician order entry, or CPOE, is a process whereby the instructions of physicians regarding the treatment of patients (particularly hospitalized patients) under their care are entered electronically by the physician, and communicated directly to the responsible individuals or services. ... Computer physician order entry, or CPOE, is a process whereby the instructions of physicians regarding the treatment of patients (particularly hospitalized patients) under their care are entered electronically by the physician, and communicated directly to the responsible individuals or services. ... Wikipedia encoded in Code 128_B A barcode (also bar code) is a machine-readable representation of information in a visual format on a surface. ... Medicare Part D is a federal program to subsidize the costs of prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. ...


Technology may introduce new sources of error:[52][53]

  • Prescriber and staff inexperience may lead to a false sense of security; that when technology suggests a course of action, errors are avoided.[30]
  • Shortcut or default selections can override non-standard medication regimens for elderly or underweight patients, resulting in toxic doses.
  • CPOE and automated drug dispensing was identified as a cause of error by 84% of over 500 health care facilities participating in a surveillance system by the United States Pharmacopoeia.[54]
  • Irrelevant or frequent warnings can interrupt work flow.

Solutions include ongoing changes in design to cope with unique medical settings, supervising overrides from automatic systems, and training (and re-training) all users. The United States Pharmacopoeia is a compendium of drugs published every five years by the United States Pharmacopoeial Convention. ...


Evidence-based medicine

National Guideline Clearinghouse "Acute pharyngitis in children"

Evidence-based medicine integrates an individual doctor's exam and diagnostic skills for a specific patient, with the best available evidence from medical research. The doctor's expertise includes both diagnostic skills and consideration of individual patient's rights and preferences in making decisions about his or her care. The clinician uses pertinent clinical research on the accuracy of diagnostic tests and the efficacy and safety of therapy, rehabilitation, and prevention to develop an individual plan of care.[55] The development of evidence-based recommendations for specific medical conditions, termed clinical practice guidelines or "best practices", has accelerated in the past few years. In the United States, over 1,700 guidelines (see example image, right) have been developed as a resource for physicians to apply to specific patient presentations.[56] The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom provides detailed "clinical guidance" for both health care professionals and the public about specific medical conditions.[57] Image File history File links Size of this preview: 674 × 600 pixelsFull resolution (1087 × 967 pixel, file size: 159 KB, MIME type: image/png) Screenshot (partial image for demonstration only) of <http://www. ... Image File history File links Size of this preview: 674 × 600 pixelsFull resolution (1087 × 967 pixel, file size: 159 KB, MIME type: image/png) Screenshot (partial image for demonstration only) of <http://www. ... Evidence-based medicine (EBM) or scientific medicine is an attempt to apply more uniformly the standards of evidence gained from the scientific method to certain aspects of medical practice. ... A medical guideline (also called a clinical guideline and clinical protocol) is a document with the aim of guiding decisions and criteria in specific areas of healthcare, as defined by an authoritative examination of current evidence (evidence-based medicine). ...


Advantages:[58][59]

  1. Evidence-based medicine may reduce adverse events, especially those involving incorrect diagnosis, outdated or risky tests or procedures, or medication overuse.
  2. Clinical guidelines provide a common framework for improving communication among clinicians, patients and non-medical purchasers of health care.
  3. Errors related to changing shifts or multiple specialists are reduced by a consistent plan of care.
  4. Information on the clinical effectiveness of treatments and services can help providers, consumers and purchasers of health care make better use of limited resources.
  5. As medical advances become available, doctors and nurses can keep up with new tests and treatments as guidelines are improved.

Drawbacks:[60][61]

  1. Managed care plans may attempt limit "unnecessary" services to cut the costs of health care, despite evidence that guidelines are not designed for general screening, rather as decision-making tools when an individual practitioner evaluates a specific patient.
  2. The medical literature is evolving and often controversial; development of guidelines requires consensus.
  3. Implementing guidelines and educating the entire health care team within a facility costs time and resources (which may be recovered by future efficiency and error reduction).
  4. Clinicians may resist evidence-based medicine as a threat to traditional relationships between patients, doctors and other health professionals, since any participant can influence decisions.
  5. Failing to follow guidelines might increase the risk of liability or disciplinary action by regulators.

Medical malpractice is an act or omission by a health care provider which deviates from accepted standards of practice in the medical community and which causes injury to the patient. ...

Mandatory reporting

United Kingdom 
The National Patient Safety Agency encourages voluntary reporting of health care errors, but has several specific instances, known as "Confidential Enquiries", for which investigation is routinely initiated: maternal or infant deaths, childhood deaths to age 16, deaths in persons with mental illness, and perioperative and unexpected medical deaths. Medical records and questionnaires are requested from the involved clinician, and participation has been high, since individual details are confidential.[62]
United States 
The 1999 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report recommended "a nationwide mandatory reporting system … that provides for … collection of standardized information by state governments about adverse events that result in death or serious harm."[63] Professional organizations, such as the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation, responded negatively: "Mandatory reporting systems in general create incentives for individuals and institutions to play a numbers game. If such reporting becomes linked to punitive action or inappropriate public disclosure, there is a high risk of driving reporting "underground", and of reinforcing the cultures of silence and blame that many believe are at the heart of the problems of medical error…"[64]
Although 23 states established mandatory reporting systems for serious patient injuries or death by 2005, the national database envisioned in the IOM report was delayed by the controversy over mandatory versus voluntary reporting.[65] Finally in 2005, the US Congress passed the long-debated Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act, establishing a federal reporting database.[66] Hospitals reports of serious patient harm are voluntary, collected by patient safety organizations under contract to analyze errors and recommend improvements. The federal government serves to coordinate data collection and maintain the national database. Reports remain confidential, and cannot be used in liability cases. Consumer groups have objected to the lack of transparency, claiming it denies the public information on the safety of specific hospitals.[67]

A patient safety organization is a group, institution or association that improves medical care by reducing medical errors. ... A patient safety organization is a group, institution or association that improves medical care by reducing medical errors. ...

Quality and safety initiatives in community pharmacy practice

Community pharmacy practice is making important advances in the quality and safety movement despite the limited number of federal and state regulations that exist and in the absence of national accreditation organizations such as the JCAHO - a driving force for quality in hospitals. Community pharmacies are using automated drug dispensing devices (robots), computerized drug utilization review tools, and most recently, the ability to receive electronic prescriptions from prescribers to decrease the risk for error and increase the likelihood of delivering high quality of care.


Quality Assurance (QA) in community practice is a relatively new concept. As of 2006, only 16 states have some form of legislation that regulates QA in community pharmacy practice. While most state QA legislation focuses on error reduction, North Carolina has recently approved legislation[68] that requires the pharmacy QA program to include error reduction strategies and assessments of the quality of their pharmaceutical care outcomes and pharmacy services.[69]


Health literacy

Health literacy is an individual's ability to read, understand and use healthcare information to make decisions and follow instructions for treatment. A study of 2,600 patients conducted in 1995 by two US hospitals found that between 26-60% of patients could not understand medication directions, a standard informed consent or basic health care materials.[70] This mismatch between a clinician's level of communication and a patient's ability to understand can lead to medication errors and adverse medical outcomes. The lack of health literacy affects all segments of the population, although it is disproportionate in certain demographic groups, such as the elderly, ethnic minorities, recent immigrants and persons with low general literacy.[71] Informed consent is a legal condition whereby a person can be said to have given consent based upon an appreciation and understanding of the facts and implications of an action. ... World literacy rates by country The traditional definition of literacy is considered to be the ability to read and write, or the ability to use language to read, write, listen, and speak. ...


According to a 2004 Institute of Medicine report, low health literacy negatively affects the outcome of healthcare.[72] These patients have a higher risk of hospitalization and longer hospital stays, are less likely to comply with treatment, are more likely to make errors with medication,[73] and are more ill when they seek medical care.[74][75]

Identifying patients at risk due to low health literacy is productive. Health behaviors such as correct medication use, taking advantage of health screening and effective preventive measures such as exercise and smoking cessation improved when low literacy patients were given visual aids, easy readability brochures or videotapes.[76] Several tests of health literacy have been developed to validate research studies,[75] but a practical, three-minute assessment can be completed in a doctor's office.[77][78] Image File history File links Size of this preview: 482 × 600 pixelsFull resolution (1152 × 1433 pixel, file size: 117 KB, MIME type: image/gif)From: <http://www. ...


Once identified, low health literacy patients benefit from providing limited but clear information at each visit, avoidance of medical jargon, using illustrations of important concepts and confirming information by a "teach back" method. A program called "Ask Me 3"[79] is designed to bring public and physician attention to this issue, by letting patients know that they should ask three questions each time they talk to a doctor, nurse, or pharmacist:

  • What is my main problem?
  • What do I need to do?
  • Why is it important for me to do this?

Pay for performance (P4P)

Pay for performance systems link compensation to measures of work quality or goals. As of 2005, 75 percent of all U.S. companies connect at least part of an employee's pay to measures of performance, and in healthcare, over 100 private and federal pilot programs are underway. Current methods of healthcare payment may actually reward less-safe care, since some insurance companies will not pay for new practices to reduce errors, while physicians and hospitals can bill for additional services that are needed when patients are injured by mistakes.[80] However, early studies showed little gain in quality for the money spent,[81][82] as well as evidence suggesting unintended consequences, like the avoidance of high-risk patients, when payment was linked to outcome improvements.[83][84] The 2006 Institute of Medicine report Preventing Medication Errors recommended "incentives...so that profitability of hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, insurance companies, and manufacturers (are) aligned with patient safety goals;...(to) strengthen the business case for quality and safety."[48] Pay for performance is an emerging movement in health insurance (initially in Britain and United States). ... 2005 is a common year starting on Saturday of the Gregorian calendar. ...


In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) began a major pay for performance initiative in 2004, known as the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF).[85] General practitioners agreed to increases in existing income according to performance with respect to 146 quality indicators covering clinical care for 10 chronic diseases, organization of care, and patient experience. Unlike proposed quality incentive programs in the United States, funding for primary care was increased 20% over previous levels. This allowed practices to invest in extra staff and technology; 90% of general practitioners use electronic prescribing, and up to 50% use electronic health records for the majority of clinical care. The first data show that substantially increasing physicians’ pay based on their success in meeting quality performance measures works. The 8,000 family practitioners included in the study earned an average of $40,000 more by collecting nearly 97% of the points available.[86] , the information in this article describes the current English public health service. ... This article does not cite any references or sources. ... To meet Wikipedias quality standards, this article or section may require cleanup. ... Electronic health record (EHR) with image and document links. ...


In the United States, Medicare has various pay-for-performance ("P4P") initiatives in offices, clinics and hospitals, seeking to improving quality and avoid unnecessary health care costs.[87] The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has several demonstration projects underway offering compensation for improvements: President Johnson signing the Medicare amendment. ... It has been suggested that Health Care Financing Administration be merged into this article or section. ...

  • Payments for better care coordination between home, hospital and offices for patients with chronic illnesses. In April 2005, CMS launched its first value-based purchasing pilot or "demonstration" project- the three-year Medicare Physician Group Practice (PGP) Demonstration.[88] The project involves ten large, multi-specialty physician practices caring for more than 200,000 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Participating practices will phase in quality standards for preventive care and the management of common chronic illnesses such as diabetes. Practices meeting these standards will be eligible for rewards from savings due to resulting improvements in patient management. The First Evaluation Report to Congress in 2006 showed that the model rewarded high quality, efficient provision of health care, but the lack of up-front payment for the investment in new systems of case management "have made for an uncertain future with respect for any payments under the demonstration."[89]
  • A set of 10 hospital quality measures which, if reported to CMS, will increase the payments that hospitals receive for each discharge. By the third year of the demonstration, those hospitals that do not meet a threshold on quality will be subject to reductions in payment. Preliminary data from the second year of the study indicates that pay for performance was associated with a roughly 2.5% to 4.0% improvement in compliance with quality measures, compared with the control hospitals.[90] Dr. Arnold Epstein of the Harvard School of Public Health commented in an accompanying editorial that pay-for-performance "is fundamentally a social experiment likely to have only modest incremental value."[91]
  • Rewards to physicians for improving health outcomes by the use of health information technology in the care of chronically ill Medicare patients.

As a disincentive, CMS has proposed eliminating payments for negative consequences of care that results in injury, illness or death. This rule, effective October 2008, would reduce payments for medical complications such as "never events" as defined by the National Quality Forum, including hospital infections.[92] Other private health payers are considering similar actions; the Leapfrog Group is exploring how to provide support to its members who are interested in ensuring that their employees do not get billed for such an event, and who do not wish to reimburse for these events themselves. Physician groups involved in the management of complications, such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America, have voiced objections to these proposals, observing that "some patients develop infections despite application of all evidence-based practices known to avoid infection", and that a punitive response may discourage further study and slow the dramatic improvements that have already been made.[93] Electronic patient chart of a health information system Health informatics or medical informatics is the intersection of information science, computer science and health care. ...


Pay for performance programs often target patients with serious and complex illnesses; such patients commonly interact with multiple healthcare providers and facilities. However, pilot programs now underway focus on simple indicators such as improvement in lab values or use of emergency services, avoiding areas of complexity such as multiple complications or several treating specialists.[94] A 2007 study analyzing Medicare beneficiaries’ healthcare visits showed that a median of two primary care physicians and five specialists provide care for a single patient.[95] The authors doubt that pay-for-performance systems can accurately attribute responsibility for the outcome of care for such patients.


Liability protection for disclosing errors

Ethical standards of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), the American Medical Association (AMA) Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, and the American College of Physicians Ethics Manual require disclosure of the most serious adverse events.[96] However, many doctors and hospitals do not report errors under the current system because of concerns about malpractice lawsuits; this prevents collection of information needed to find and correct the conditions that lead to mistakes.[97] As of 2006, twenty US states have statutes allowing doctors and health care providers to apologize and offer expressions of regret without their words being used against them in court. Pennsylvania, Florida, and Nevada have also passed laws mandating written disclosure of adverse events and bad outcomes to patients and families. In September 2005, US Senators Clinton and Obama introduced the National Medical Error Disclosure and Compensation (MEDiC) Bill, providing physicians protection from liability and a safe environment for disclosure, as part of a program to notify and compensate patients harmed by medical errors.[98] This national approach is modeled after a University of Michigan Hospital System program that has reduced the number of lawsuits against the hospital by half and has decreased the average litigation cost. The American Medical Association (AMA) is the largest association of medical doctors in the United States. ... The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of doctors of internal medicine (internists) -- physicians who specialize in the prevention, detection and treatment of illnesses in adults. ... For other uses, see Malpractice (disambiguation). ... 2006 is a common year starting on Sunday of the Gregorian calendar. ... Hillary Rodham Clinton (born Hillary Diane Rodham on October 26, 1947) is the Biggest loser/retard these united states have seen from New York. ... Barack Hussein Obama (born August 4, 1961) is the junior United States Senator from Illinois and a member of the Democratic Party. ... The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (U of M, U-M or simply Michigan) is a coeducational public research university in the state of Michigan, and one of the foremost universities in the United States. ...


Studies

Numerous organizations, government branches, and private companies conduct research studies to investigate the overall health of patient safety in America and across the globe. Despite the shocking and widely publicized statistics on preventable deaths due to medical errors in America’s hospitals, the 2006 National Healthcare Quality Report[99] assembled by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) had the following sobering assessment: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), formerly known as the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), supports research designed to improve the outcomes and quality of health care, reduce its costs, address patient safety and medical errors, and broaden access to effective services. ...

  • Most measures of Quality are improving, but the pace of change remains modest.
  • Quality improvement varies by setting and phase of care.
  • The rate of improvement accelerated for some measures while a few continued to show deterioration.
  • Variation in heath care quality remains high.

The Health Grades study in April 2006 determined that over 3% of hospitalized Medicare patients experienced adverse events, and that the total number of patient safety incidents has been increasing since 2001.[100]

Organizations advocating patient safety

Several authors of the 1999 Institute of Medicine report revisited the status of their recommendations and the state of patient safety, five years after "To Err is Human".[80] Discovering that patient safety had become a frequent topic for journalists, health care experts, and the public, it was harder to see overall improvements on a national level. What was noteworthy was the impact on attitudes and organizations. Few health care professionals now doubted that preventable medical injuries were a serious problem. The central concept of the report—that bad systems and not bad people lead to most errors—became established in patient safety efforts. A broad array of organizations now advance the cause of patient safety. A patient safety organization is a group, institution or association that improves medical care by reducing medical errors. ...

Government Agencies
Australia and New Zealand
United Kingdom
United States
Organizations
Australia
Canada
United Kingdom
United States
Medication Errors

Further reading

Year 2005 (MMV) was a common year starting on Saturday (link displays full calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 292nd day of the year (293rd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ...

References

  1. ^ National Institute of Health, History of Medicine: Greek Medicine
  2. ^ The Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation, A Brief History
  3. ^ Janice Tomlin (producer): The Deep Sleep: 6,000 will die or suffer brain damage, WLS-TV Chicago, 20/20. April 22, 1982
  4. ^ Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation: The establishment of the APSF by Ellison C. Pierce, Jr., M.D.
  5. ^ Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation: Comments From the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation
  6. ^ David M Gaba (2000). "Anesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care". Medical Care 320: 785-788. Retrieved on 2006-06-24. 
  7. ^ Thomas, Eric J. MD, MPH, et al (2000). "Incidence and Types of Adverse Events and Negligent Care in Utah and Colorado (Abstract)". Medical Care 280 (38): 261-271. Retrieved on 2006-06-23. 
  8. ^ TA Brennan, LL Leape, et al (1991). "Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study (Abstract)". The New England Journal of Medicine 324 (6): 370-376. Retrieved on 2006-06-23. 
  9. ^ a b Institute of Medicine (1999). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System (1999). The National Academies Press. Retrieved on 2006-06-20.
  10. ^ Charatan, Fred (2000). Clinton acts to reduce medical mistakes. BMJ Publishing Group. Retrieved on 2006-06-23.
  11. ^ Harold C. Sox, Jr, Steven Woloshin (2000). "How Many Deaths Are Due to Medical Error? Getting the Number Right". Effective Clinical Practice. Retrieved on 2006-06-22. 
  12. ^ HealthGrades Quality Study: Patient Safety in American Hospitals, July 2004PDF (223 KiB)
  13. ^ Commonwealth Fund International Survey: Taking the Pulse of Health Care Systems: Experiences of Patients with Health Problems in Six Countries (2005)
  14. ^ Wilson RMcL, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, et al (1995). "The Quality in Australian Health Care Study". Medical Journal of Australia 163 (9): 458-71. Retrieved on 2006-07-01. 
  15. ^ Australian Broadcasting Corporation, The World Today: Concerns over medication errors in Australian hospitals
  16. ^ Department of Health Expert Group (2000). An organisation with a memory. Department of Health, United Kingdom. Retrieved on 2006-07-01.
  17. ^ G. Ross Baker, Peter G. Norton, et al (2004). "The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada". Canadian Medical Association Journal 170 (11): 1678-1685. Retrieved on 2006-07-04. 
  18. ^ Adverse Events in New Zealand Public Hospitals: Principal Findings from a National Survey. New Zealand Ministry of Health. Retrieved on 2006-07-15.
  19. ^ (2001) "Incidence of adverse events in hospitals. A retrospective study of medical records". Ugeskr Laeger 163 (39): 4377-9. Retrieved on 2006-07-15. 
  20. ^ World Alliance for Patient Safety: Patient safety_a global priorityPDF (56.6 KiB) Editorial, December 2004 (retrieved on July 15, 2006)
  21. ^ Paul A, Gluck, MD: Medical Errors: Incidence, Theories, Myths and Solutions (Presentation at the Seminole County Patient Safety Summit, April 22, 2006)
  22. ^ a b c Saul N Weingart, Ross McL Wilson, Robert W Gibberd, and Bernadette Harrison (2000). "Epidemiology of medical error". British Medical Journal 320: 774–777. Retrieved on 2006-06-23. 
  23. ^ Wu AW, Folkman S, McPhee SJ, Lo B (1998). "Do house officers learn from their mistakes?". JAMA 265: 2089-2094. Retrieved on 2006-06-24. 
  24. ^ a b c (July 2001) "Exploring the causes of adverse events in NHS hospital practice". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 94 (7): 322-330. Retrieved on 2006-07-15. 
  25. ^ Antony Nocera, Diana Strange Khursandi (1998). "Doctors' working hours: can the medical profession afford to let the courts decide what is reasonable?". Medical Journal of Australia 168: 616-618. Retrieved on 2006-06-24. 
  26. ^ Landrigan CP, et al (2004). "Effect of reducing interns' work hours on serious medical errors in intensive care units". New England Journal of Medicine 351: 1838-48. Retrieved on 2006-06-28. 
  27. ^ Laura K. Barger, Najib T. Ayas, Brian E. Cade, John W. Cronin, Bernard Rosner, Frank E. Speizer, Charles A. Czeisler (2006). "Impact of Extended-Duration Shifts on Medical Errors, Adverse Events, and Attentional Failures". PLoS Medicine 3(12): e487. Retrieved on 2007-01-12. 
  28. ^ Linda H. Aiken, PhD,RN, et al (2002). "Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality...". JAMA 288: 1987-1993. Retrieved on 2006-06-24. 
  29. ^ a b Gardner, Amanda (6 March 2007). Medication Errors During Surgeries Particularly Dangerous. The Washington Post. Retrieved on 2007-03-13.
  30. ^ a b McDonald, MD, Clement J. (2006). "Computerization Can Create Safety Hazards: A Bar-Coding Near Miss". Annals of Internal Medicine 144 (7): 510-516. Retrieved on 2006-07-31. 
  31. ^ Clement JP, Lindrooth RC, Chukmaitov AS, Chen HF (February 2007). "Does the patient's payer matter in hospital patient safety?: a study of urban hospitals". Medical Care 45 (2): 131-8. Retrieved on 2007-04-07. 
  32. ^ a b René Amalberti, MD, PhD; Yves Auroy, MD; Don Berwick, MD, MPP; and Paul Barach, MD, MPH (2005). "Five System Barriers to Achieving Ultrasafe Health Care". Annals of Internal Medicine 142: 756-764. Retrieved on 2006-07-12. 
  33. ^ Institute of Medicine (1999). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System, page 4. The National Academies Press. Retrieved on 2006-07-01.
  34. ^ Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Accidents and Accident Rates, 1986 through 2005, U.S. Air Carriers
  35. ^ Robert Helmreich (2000). "On error management: lessons from aviation". British Medical Journal 320: 781-785. Retrieved on 2006-06-24. 
  36. ^ J Bryan Sexton, Eric J Thomas, Robert L Helmreich (2000). "Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation". British Medical Journal 320: 745-749. Retrieved on 2006-06-24. 
  37. ^ L. A. Lenert, MD, MS, H. Burstin, MD, MPH, L. Connell, MA, RN, J. Gosbee, MD, MS, and G. Phillips (2002). "Federal Patient Safety Initiatives Panel Summary". J Am Med Inform Assoc 9: s8-s10. Retrieved on 2006-06-28. 
  38. ^ Mandak, Joe. "Database seeks to lower firefighter deaths", USA Today, September 18, 2005. Retrieved on 2006-07-08. 
  39. ^ AORN: SafetyNet
  40. ^ Tamuz M, Harrison MI (2006). "Improving patient safety in hospitals: Contributions of high-reliability theory and normal accident theory.". Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41 (4 Pt 2):1654-76. 41: 1654-76. Retrieved on 2006-09-08. 
  41. ^ Institute of Medicine (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. The National Academies Press. Retrieved on 2006-06-29.
  42. ^ RAND Healthcare: Health Information Technology: Can HIT Lower Costs and Improve Quality? Retrieved on July 8, 2006
  43. ^ American College of Physicians Observer: How EMR software can help prevent medical mistakes by Jerome H. Carter (September 2004)
  44. ^ Kensaku Kawamoto, fellow1, Caitlin A Houlihan, E Andrew Balas, David F Lobach (2005). "Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success". British Medical Journal 330: 765-768. Retrieved on 2006-06-29. 
  45. ^ Gans D, Kralewski J, Hammons T, Dowd B (2005). "Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems". Health affairs (Project Hope) 24 (5): 1323-1333. Retrieved on 2006-07-04. 
  46. ^ NHS Connecting for Health: Delivering the National Programme for IT Retrieved August 4, 2006
  47. ^ C J Morris, B S P Savelyich, A J Avery, J A Cantrill and A Sheikh (2005). "Patient safety features of clinical computer systems: questionnaire survey of GP views". Quality and Safety in Health Care 14: 164-168. Retrieved on 2006-07-08. 
  48. ^ a b c d The Institute of Medicine (2006). "Preventing Medication Errors". The National Academies Press. Retrieved on 2006-07-21. 
  49. ^ David W. Bates, MD, et al (1998). "Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and a Team Intervention on Prevention of Serious Medication Errors". JAMA 280: 1311-1316. Retrieved on 2006-06-20. 
  50. ^ Hospital Quality & Safety Survey (PDF). The Leapfrog Group (2004). Retrieved on 2006-07-08.
  51. ^ Kaufman, Marc. "Medication Errors Harming Millions, Report Says. Extensive National Study Finds Widespread, Costly Mistakes in Giving and Taking Medicine", The Washington Post, 2005-07-21, pp. A08. Retrieved on 2006-07-21. 
  52. ^ Ross Koppel, PhD, et al (2005). "Role of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Facilitating Medication Errors". JAMA 293: 1197-1203. Retrieved on 2006-06-28. 
  53. ^ Lohr, Steve. "Doctors' Journal Says Computing Is No Panacea", The New York Times, 2005-03-09. Retrieved on 2006-07-15. 
  54. ^ Santell, John P (2004). Computer Related Errors: What Every Pharmacist Should Know (PDF). United States Pharmacopia. Retrieved on 2006-06-20.
  55. ^ David L Sackett, William M C Rosenberg, J A Muir Gray, R Brian Haynes, W Scott Richardson (1996). "Editorials: Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't". British Medical Journal 312: 71-72. Retrieved on 2006-06-28. 
  56. ^ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: The National Guideline Clearinghouse
  57. ^ The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Providing national guidance on promoting good health
  58. ^ William Rosenberg, Anna Donald (1995). "Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving". British Medical Journal 310: 1122-1126. Retrieved on 2006-06-28. 
  59. ^ Institute of Medicine: Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use (1992)
  60. ^ Tonelli, MR (2001). The limits of evidence-based medicine. NCBI PubMed. Retrieved on 2006-06-27.
  61. ^ American College of Surgeons Bulletin: Practice guidelines and liability implications
  62. ^ National Confidential Enquiries StrategyPDF
  63. ^ Institute of Medicine: To Err is Human (1999) Recommendation 5.1: Mandatory Reporting
  64. ^ Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation: APSF Response to the IOM Report (February 2000)
  65. ^ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Reporting Requirements Cloud Consensus on Curbing Medical Errors (May 2000)
  66. ^ 109th US Congress: Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 (7/29/2005)
  67. ^ The Washington Post: Plan Would Compile, Analyze Medical Errors by Gilbert M. Gaul (July 29, 2005) page A06
  68. ^ http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2005&BillID=hb1493
  69. ^ Kessler, JM. Pharmacy Quality Assurance. Journal of the North Carolina Association of Pharmacists 2005: Winter
  70. ^ M. V. Williams, et al (1995). "Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals". JAMA 274 (21): 677-82. Retrieved on 2006-06-30. 
  71. ^ 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy The Health Literacy of America’s Adults Retrieved 9 September 2006
  72. ^ The Institute of Medicine: Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion (2004)
  73. ^ Terry C. Davis, PhD; Michael S. Wolf, PhD, MPH; Pat F. Bass III, MD; Jason A. Thompson, BA; Hugh H. Tilson, MD, DrPH; Marolee Neuberger, MS; and Ruth M. Parker, MD (2006). "Literacy and Misunderstanding Prescription Drug Labels". Annals of Internal Medicine 145 (12). Retrieved on 2006-11-30. 
  74. ^ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Quick Guide to Health Literacy
  75. ^ a b M. V. Williams, et al (1995). "The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills.". J Gen Intern Med. 10 (10): 537-41. Retrieved on 2006-06-30. 
  76. ^ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 87 Literacy and Health Outcomes
  77. ^ Barry D. Weiss, MD, et al (2005). "Quick Assessment of Literacy in Primary Care: The Newest Vital Sign". Annals of Family Medicine 3: 514-522. Retrieved on 2006-06-30. 
  78. ^ The Newest Vital Sign: a Health Literacy Assessment Tool
  79. ^ Ask Me Three
  80. ^ a b The Commonwealth Fund: Five Years After "To Err Is Human": What Have We Learned?
  81. ^ Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD; Richard G. Frank, PhD; Zhonghe Li, MA; Arnold M. Epstein, MD, MA (2005). "Early Experience With Pay-for-Performance: From Concept to Practice". JAMA 294 (14): 1788-1793. Retrieved on 2006-07-08. 
  82. ^ Laura A. Petersen, MD, MPH; LeChauncy D. Woodard, MD, MPH; Tracy Urech, BA; Christina Daw, MPH; and Supicha Sookanan, MPH (2006). "Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care?". Annals of Internal Medicine 145 (4): 265-272. Retrieved on 2006-08-14. 
  83. ^ M .B. Rosenthal and R. G. Frank (2006). "What Is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care?". Medical Care Research and Review 63 (2): 135-57. Retrieved on 2006-07-08. 
  84. ^ US Congress, House Committee on Employer-Employee Relations: Pay For Performance Measures and Other Trends in Employer Sponsored Healthcare, Testimony of Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhDPDF (31.5 KiB) May 17, 2005
  85. ^ National Health Service: Quality and Outcomes Framework data Retrieved July 8, 2006
  86. ^ Tim Doran, M.P.H., Catherine Fullwood, Ph.D., Hugh Gravelle, Ph.D., David Reeves, Ph.D., Evangelos Kontopantelis, Ph.D., Urara Hiroeh, Ph.D., and Martin Roland, D.M. (2006). "Pay-for-Performance Programs in Family Practices in the United Kingdom". The New England Journal of Medicine 355 (4): 375-384. Retrieved on 2006-08-02. 
  87. ^ Medicare: "Pay For Performance (P4P) Initiatives"
  88. ^ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Medicare Begins Performance-Based Payments For Physician Groups (Retrieved 2007-04-15)
  89. ^ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration: First Evaluation Report to Congress (Retrieved 2007-04-15)
  90. ^ Peter K., et al (2007). "Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement". The New England Journal of Medicine 356 (3): 486-496. Retrieved on 2007-01-29. 
  91. ^ Arnold M. Epstein, MD (2007). "Pay for Performance at the Tipping Point". The New England Journal of Medicine 356 (3): 515-517. Retrieved on 2007-01-29. 
  92. ^ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Eliminating Serious, Costly and Preventable Medical Errors (May 18, 2006)
  93. ^ IDSA, SHEA and APIC: Comment on CMS Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule 1488P: Healthcare-associated infection (June 13, 2006)
  94. ^ American Academy of Neurology, Federal Legislation Position Statements: Pay-For-Performance (Retrieved 2007-04-15)
  95. ^ Pham HH et al (2007-03-15). "Care patterns in Medicare and their implications for pay for performance". The New England Journal of Medicine 356 (11): 1130-9. Retrieved on 2007-03-16. 
  96. ^ American Medical Association: Code of Ethics
  97. ^ Medical News Today: Sens. Rodham Clinton, Obama Propose National Medical Error Disclosure Program, USA (29 September 2005)
  98. ^ Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama (2006). "Making Patient Safety the Centerpiece of Medical Liability Reform". The New England Journal of Medicine 354: 2205-2208. Retrieved on 2006-06-27. 
  99. ^ AHRQ: 2006 National Healthcare Quality Report Retrieved 2007-01-12
  100. ^ HealthGrades: Third Annual Patient Safety in American Hospitals StudyPDF (302 KiB) November 20, 2006

Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... June 24 is the 175th day of the year (176th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar, with 190 days remaining. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 174th day of the year (175th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 174th day of the year (175th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 171st day of the year (172nd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 174th day of the year (175th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 173rd day of the year (174th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... The Portable Document Format (PDF) is the file format created by Adobe Systems in 1993 for document exchange. ... A kibibyte (a contraction of kilo binary byte) is a unit of information or computer storage, commonly abbreviated KiB (never kiB). 1 kibibyte = 210 bytes = 1,024 bytes The kibibyte is closely related to the kilobyte, which can be used either as a synonym for kibibyte or to refer to... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 182nd day of the year (183rd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 182nd day of the year (183rd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 185th day of the year (186th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 196th day of the year (197th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 196th day of the year (197th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... The Portable Document Format (PDF) is the file format created by Adobe Systems in 1993 for document exchange. ... A kibibyte (a contraction of kilo binary byte) is a unit of information or computer storage, commonly abbreviated KiB (never kiB). 1 kibibyte = 210 bytes = 1,024 bytes The kibibyte is closely related to the kilobyte, which can be used either as a synonym for kibibyte or to refer to... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 174th day of the year (175th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... June 24 is the 175th day of the year (176th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar, with 190 days remaining. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 196th day of the year (197th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... June 24 is the 175th day of the year (176th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar, with 190 days remaining. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 179th day of the year (180th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... is the 12th day of the year in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... June 24 is the 175th day of the year (176th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar, with 190 days remaining. ... is the 65th day of the year (66th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... is the 72nd day of the year (73rd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 212th day of the year (213th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... April 7 is the 97th day of the year in the Gregorian calendar (98th in leap years). ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 193rd day of the year (194th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 182nd day of the year (183rd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... June 24 is the 175th day of the year (176th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar, with 190 days remaining. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... June 24 is the 175th day of the year (176th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar, with 190 days remaining. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 179th day of the year (180th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 189th day of the year (190th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 251st day of the year (252nd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 180th day of the year (181st in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 180th day of the year (181st in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 185th day of the year (186th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 189th day of the year (190th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 202nd day of the year (203rd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 171st day of the year (172nd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 189th day of the year (190th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2005 (MMV) was a common year starting on Saturday (link displays full calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 202nd day of the year (203rd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 202nd day of the year (203rd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 179th day of the year (180th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2005 (MMV) was a common year starting on Saturday (link displays full calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 68th day of the year (69th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 196th day of the year (197th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 171st day of the year (172nd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 179th day of the year (180th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 179th day of the year (180th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 178th day of the year (179th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... The Portable Document Format (PDF) is the file format created by Adobe Systems in 1993 for document exchange. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 181st day of the year (182nd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 334th day of the year (335th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 181st day of the year (182nd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 181st day of the year (182nd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 189th day of the year (190th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 226th day of the year (227th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 189th day of the year (190th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... The Portable Document Format (PDF) is the file format created by Adobe Systems in 1993 for document exchange. ... A kibibyte (a contraction of kilo binary byte) is a unit of information or computer storage, commonly abbreviated KiB (never kiB). 1 kibibyte = 210 bytes = 1,024 bytes The kibibyte is closely related to the kilobyte, which can be used either as a synonym for kibibyte or to refer to... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 214th day of the year (215th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... is the 105th day of the year (106th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... is the 105th day of the year (106th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... January 29 is the 29th day of the year in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... January 29 is the 29th day of the year in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... is the 105th day of the year (106th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... is the 74th day of the year (75th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... March 16 is the 75th day of the year (76th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday (link displays full 2006 calendar) of the Gregorian calendar. ... is the 178th day of the year (179th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era. ... is the 12th day of the year in the Gregorian calendar. ... The Portable Document Format (PDF) is the file format created by Adobe Systems in 1993 for document exchange. ... A kibibyte (a contraction of kilo binary byte) is a unit of information or computer storage, commonly abbreviated KiB (never kiB). 1 kibibyte = 210 bytes = 1,024 bytes The kibibyte is closely related to the kilobyte, which can be used either as a synonym for kibibyte or to refer to...

See also


  Results from FactBites:
 
Patient Safety (262 words)
The Kentucky Medical Association's Patient Safety Task Force was created in 1999 to promote safe practices in an effort to enhance the quality of health care provided in Kentucky.
Patients oftentimes seek antibiotics for cold and flu symptoms when such treatment is unneeded, unhelpful and in some circumstances harmful.
The KMA Patient Safety Task Force discussed this issue and noted several resources that physicians can use to educate their patients on when to seek antibiotics.
Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Home Page (282 words)
As President of the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF), it is my privilege to report annually on the activities of the foundation during the past calendar year.
When patients sustain brain damage or die because of a major error by an anesthesiologist, these cases may properly be termed anesthetic "disasters." More...
The Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation is pleased to announce the winners of the 2005 research and education grant.
  More results at FactBites »

 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m