A jury is a body of persons convened to render a verdict (finding of fact) on a legal question officially submitted to them, or to set a penalty or judgement in a jury trial of a court of law. Juries are an essential part of due process and liberal democracy, and are used in common law jurisdictions as well as in some civil law jurisdictions. The members of a jury are known as jurors.
The size and power of the jury are fixed by law and differ from country to country, from region to region, and from case to case. Juries in criminal law and civil law are quite different. In criminal law, separate juries are convened to decide if a suspect should be indicted (formally charged with a crime) and if the suspect should be found guilty. In many areas, depending upon the law, a third jury will determine what the penalty should be or recommend what the penalty should be in the penalty phase. In general, the size of juries tends to be larger if the crime alleged is more serious.
American criminal justice procedure whereby, in each court district, a group of 16-23 citizens hold an inquiry on criminal complaints brought by the prosecutor and decide if a trial is warranted, in which case an indictment is issued. If a Grand Jury rejects a proposed indictment it is known as a "no bill"; if they accept to endorse a proposed indictment it is known as a "true bill".
As on the question of a defendant's guilt in a jury trial, the role of the jury is the "finder of fact" as well as the judge of the validity of the law itself according to multiple U.S. Supreme Court rulings. This means the jury decides the correct version of events from the often-conflicting testimony and other evidence, and may find the defendent "not guilty" even he violated the law if the jury thinks that law is invalid or unjust. Officially, the judge must inform the jury of the instructions the judge the "facts" but is not legally required to inform the jury of the right to jury nullification. An organization called the Fully Informed Jury Association argues that jurors should be informed by the judge that they have the right to "judge the law". When there is no jury ("bench trial"), the judge assumes both roles.
In the U.S., the term can refer to a grand jury which issues an indictment or a petit jury which is present at a trial. When used alone the term usually refers to the latter.
In the United States, England and Scotland, defendants in most serious criminal cases have a right to trial by jury. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to jury trial in both state and federal criminal proceedings, although in practice most criminal actions in the US are resolved by plea bargain.
Juries are also used in many civil cases in the United States, and the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution explicitly protects the right to a jury trial in civil cases tried in the United States District Courts.
In English law, juries are only used in civil cases for criminal libel, or in some cases where the state is the defendant, such as some cases of wrongful imprisonment.
In most criminal justice systems which require juries, panels are initially selected at random from the adult population of the district served by the court concerned. Individuals once selected are required by law to serve, with exemptions possible for people whose job in some way precludes them (for instance, teachers, doctors, or people who themselves work in the criminal justice system), are caring for young children, or who have health problems. They may also be excused from a particular case (but not from jury duty as such) by the judge. Most jurisdictions limit jury service to citizens.
Potential jurors form the jury in waiting or jury pool. Jurors are picked by a selection process. If the jury in waiting is exhausted without the jury being completed the clerk of the court has to ask the jury assembly area to send more jurors.
Selected jurors are subjected to a system of examination known as voir dire whereby both the prosecution (or plaintiff, in a civil case) and defense can object to a juror. In England these objections would have to be very well based, such as the defendant knowing a potential juror, to be allowed. Some jurisdictions give both the defense and prosecution a specific number of unconditional peremptory challenges, while most allow argument over whether a juror's particular background or beliefs make them biased and therefore unsuitable for service on the jury. In the United States, and probably other nations, it is hardly unknown for citizens to quite deliberately get out of jury duty (for example by mentioning knowledge of legal concepts).
Typically a jury panel has twelve members, sometimes with a number of "alternates" who follow the trial but are not included in the deliberations unless a jury member is unable to continue for some reason.
In most civil law systems, a jury is not used, although lay assessors perform many of the functions of juries in some systems. In the US, juries are used in civil trials. In Japan, the post-war constitution guarantees the right to trial by jury, although this right is almost never used because it is believed that anyone who is desperate enough to want to have fellow citizens decide their fate is almost certainly guilty of the crime that they are charged with.
The jurors then hear the cases presented by both the defense and prosecution, and in some jurisdictions a summing-up from the judge. They then retire as a group to consider a verdict, which they must reach unanimously in US criminal cases. If no verdict can be reached by the jury, (sometimes referred to as a hung jury,) a mistrial is declared, and the case must be retried with a newly constituted jury.
Some jurisdictions allow majority verdicts in criminal cases if a juror becomes unfit to continue, or if a judge permits it when a jury is deadlocked. At least 10 jurors must agree. Other than that, there are no restrictions on how a jury may proceed to reach such a verdict, and no set time limit. Occasionally juries deliberate for several days. Usually initially a judge will instruct a jury not to contemplate a majority verdict. After a time, if no verdict is forthcoming, the judge will recall the jury and instruct them that he is prepared to consider one.
There is no set format for jury deliberations, and the jury will take a period of time to settle into discussing the evidence. In theory electing a foreman is the first step, although for a short or straightforward case this might not in fact happen other than picking someone to deliver the verdict at the end having arrived at it.
The foreman if elected will chair the discussions and it is his or her job to try and steer the jury towards a conclusion. The first step will typically be to find out the initial feeling or reaction to the case, which may be by a show of hands. The jury will then attempt to arrive at a consensus verdict.
The exchanges of views as people with opinions that differ from the emerging consensus explain them will air the issues involved in the case and often as a result points will arise from the trial that were not specifically discussed during it. The result of these discussions is likely to be that one interpretation is shown to be the most reasonable, and a verdict is thus arrived at.
In English law, the jury's deliberations must not be disclosed outside the jury, even after the case, and to repeat parts of them is contempt of court and can result in imprisonment. In the USA this rule does not apply, and sometimes jurors have made remarks that called into question whether a verdict was properly arrived at.
Sometimes a jury will take a wider view than the judge's summing up, and reach a verdict influenced by or based on their view of the public interest - that is, whether they think it right, all things considered, for the defendant to be convicted of a crime. Verdicts which appear not to apply the law to the evidence (such as the Ponting case) are sometimes called perverse verdicts.
In the United States, some juries are also empowered to consider some aspects of a defendant's sentence, if the defendant has been convicted. This is notably now a requirement in all death penalty cases. This is not the practice in most other legal systems based on the English tradition, in which judges retain sole responsibility for deciding sentences according to law.
The exception is the award of damages in English law libel cases, although a judge is now obliged to make a recommendation to the jury as to the appropriate amount.
The term "jury" is also used for groups of judges who decide on awards in various artistic areas, notably writing and film.
The period between 1830-1850 was when the modern adversarial jury trial took shape. See: D. J. A. Cairns, Advocacy and the Making of the Adversarial Criminal Trial, 1800-1865 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)
The United States
Jury selection is a rather complicated process. A jury is made up from a list of citizens living in the jurisdiction of the court. When selected, being a juror is in principle compulsory. However, jurors can be dismissed for several reasons and many people are released from serving on a jury. People can, for instance, claim hardship if they take care of their children, or claim to be biased. It is sometimes joked that a jury is not "a jury of one's peers", but is instead "twelve people too stupid to get out of jury duty." (Homer Simpson famously quoted this).
The jury is made of 9 lay jurors in first instance and 12 on appeal, supplemented with 3 professional judges. Both the jurors and the judges, sitting with equal rights, first judge the facts, then sentence the criminal.
Jury selection is a rather complicated process. A jury is made up from a list of citizens registered for voting in the jurisdiction of the court, but there are exemptions (because of old age, for instance) and incompatibilities with certain public positions. Attendance is otherwise compulsory, but costs and loss of pay are compensated by the state.
England and Wales
In England and Wales, the jury consists of 12 jurors, each randomly selected from the electoral register for the locality of the court. Any registered voter between the ages 18 and 70 may therefore be selected, although there are numerous reasons for exemption from duty. These include insufficient understanding of English, certain occupations (e.g. students, teachers, armed forces and MPs) and being a member of a closed religious order. In addition, any summoned juror may defer their jury service for up to 12 months. The court will reimburse loss of earnings (currently, no more than £60 per day), travel costs and a subsistence rate.
As regards the selection process, a large number are selected at random from the electoral register -- many more than needed, since some may find they are excused, defer initial service or be moved to another court (due to a change of address not notified). When a court requires a jury, 14-16 potential jurors (sometimes more if there are expected to be problems selecting a jury - 25 has been known) are selected at random from those in attendance, and led to the courtroom by an usher. Once there, 12 names are drawn from the list and, pending objection (which is heard immediately) or a request to 'stand by for the Crown' (heard only if fewer than 12 are empanelled), sworn in. Jurors can either take an oath swearing "by almighty God" on a religious book of their choice, or make a faith-neutral affirmation.
Before being sworn in, the judge will, in the event of a long case, ask if anyone would have a problem with serving on such a case. This can be done by inviting the jurors to speak to the judge individually, so that their exact reasons need not be disclosed to everyone in the court. If employment related grounds are cited, the juror is expected to be able to argue that he and only he can do a task at work that must be done before his jury service would finish. Self employed people whose businesses might evapourate during long jury duty are likely to be heard sympathetically.
Jury duty generally involves a lot of waiting to be called down for possible selection for a jury. This is seen as being unavoidable since the jury summonses are based on estimates of how many cases are expected to start. Some defendants plead guilty at the beginning of a trial, and there may be other reasons, such as legal argument, why a jury does not in fact get selected on that particular day. There is also a warn list which means that a case might get called only at lunchtime the day before being heard.
- Guide to California Jury Service (http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jury/)
- Court of assizes in Belgium (including info about the jury) (http://www.just.fgov.be/proces-arlon/en/)
- Guide to Jury Service in England and Wales (http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/using_courts/jury/guide.htm)