FACTOID # 12: It's not the government they hate: Washington DC has the highest number of hate crimes per capita in the US.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   States A-Z   Flags   Maps   FAQ   About 
   
 
WHAT'S NEW
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > House of Orleans
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Orleanist. (Discuss)

Following the French July Revolution in 1830, the restored Bourbon monarch Charles X was replaced by Louis Philippe, son of Louis Philippe Joseph, duc d'Orléan. He ruled as a constitutional monarch, and was called "King of the French," not "of France." His reign lasted until the 1848 revolution, when he abdicated and fled to England. He was the only Orléanist king of France. Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. ... Orleanists comprised a French political faction or party which arose out of the Revolution, and ceased to have a separate existence shortly after the establishment of the Third Republic in 1872. ... Liberty Leading the People by Eugène Delacroix commemorates the July Revolution The French Revolution of 1830, also known as the July Revolution, was a revolt by the middle class against Bourbon King Charles X which forced him out of office and replaced him with the Orleanist King Louis-Philippe. ... Following the ousting of Napoleon Bonaparte in 1814, the Allies restored the Bourbon Dynasty to the French throne. ... Charles X, King of France and of Navarre (October 9, 1757 – November 6, 1836) was born at the Palace of Versailles. ... Louis-Philippe of France (October 6, 1773–August 26, 1850), reigned as the Orléanist king of the French from 1830 to 1848. ... Louis-Philippe-Joseph dOrléans, by Antoine-François Callet. ... Up to 1848 in France As 1848 began, liberals awaited the death of King Louis Philippe, expecting revolution after his death. ...


The Policies of the July Monarchy

When Louis-Philippe, the Orleanist “King of the French,” ascended to power, he certainly understood his base of power. The wealthy bourgeoisie carried him aloft through their work in the Parliament, and throughout his reign, he kept their interests in mind. For the first several years, though, the monarchy appeared to move toward legitimate, broad-based reform. This movement was largely illusory. While the source of the regime’s legitimacy, the Constitution of 1830, was written upon a platform of religious equality, the empowerment of the citizenry through the creation of a National Guard, electoral reform, the reformation of the peerage system, the lessening of Royal Authority, and the rise of some sort of popular authority, the regime paid only lip service to those aims.


During the years of the July Monarchy, enfranchisement roughly doubled, from 94,000 under Charles X to more than 200,000 by 1848. However, this enlarged figure represented only roughly one percent of population, and as the requirements for voting were tax-based, only the wealthiest gained the privilege. By implication, the enlarged enfranchisement tended to favor the wealthy merchant bourgeoisie more than any other group, giving them the ability to challenge the nobility in electoral matters. Thus, while appearing to honor his pledge to increase suffrage, Louis-Philippe acted primarily to empower his supporters. The inclusion of only the wealthiest also tended to undermine any possibility of the growth of a radical faction in Parliament, effectively serving socially conservative ends.


The reformed charter of 1830 limited the power of the King – stripping him of his ability to propose and decree legislation, and well as limiting his executive authority. However, the limits placed upon Louis-Philippe accomplished very little. The King of the French still believed that he should not become a king who, “reigns, but does not rule,” and as such, he was deeply involved in legislative affairs. He maneuvered to have his two eldest sons appointed to the Chamber of Peers, and increasingly appointed ministers who adhered to his vision of conservative liberalism and strong Constitutional Monarchy. Thus, again, while appearing to adhere to notions of popular sovereignty and reduced royal power, the Crown actively worked toward completely opposite conservative ends.


In addition, one of the first acts of Louis-Philippe, ostensible champion of liberalism and reform, in constructing his cabinet was to appoint the rather conservative Casimir Perier as the premier of that body. Perier, a banker, was instrumental in shutting down many of the secret societies and labor unions that formed during the early years of the regime. In addition, he oversaw the dismemberment of the National Guard after it proved too supportive of radical ideologies. He performed all of these actions, of course, with royal approval. He was once quoted as saying that the source of French misery was the belief that there had been a revolution. “No Monsieur,” he said to another minister, “there has not been a revolution: there is simply a change at the head of state.” He thus viewed the purpose of the government as preserving the status quo against Republican and radical agitators. He garnered the support of the cabinet through oaths of solidarity and strict discipline for dissenters. He excluded reformers from official discourse, and abandoned the regime’s unofficial policy of mediating in labor disputes in favor of a strict laissez-faire policy that favored employers. Thus, one sees the emergence of a clear trope of supporting the rights of the wealthy bourgeoisie while actively working to protect the status quo.


Further expressions of this trend came under the supervision of Perier and the then Minister of the Interior, Francois Guizot. The regime acknowledged early on that radicalism and republicanism threatened it, undermining its laissez-faire and pro-business policies. Thus, the Monarchy declared the very term republican illegal in 1834. Guizot shut down Republican clubs and disbanded Republican publications. Republicans within the cabinet, like the banker Dupont, were all but excluded by Perier and his conservative clique. The National Guard was disbanded after it failed to break up labor strikes, and the army was reformed in order to ensure its loyalty to the government.


Though two factions always persisted in the cabinet, split between liberal conservatives like Guizot and liberal reformers like the aforementioned journalist Thiers, the latter never gained prominence. After Perier came Mole, another conservative. After Mole came Thiers, a reformer sacked by Louis-Philippe after attempting to pursue an aggressive foreign policy. After Theirs came the conservative Guizot. In particular, the Guizot administration was marked by increasingly authoritarian crackdowns on republicanism and dissent, and an increasingly pro-business laissez-faire policy. This policy included protective tariffs that defended the status quo and enriched French businessmen. Guizot’s government granted railway and mining contracts to the bourgeois supporters of the government, and even contributing some of the start-up costs. As workers under these policies had no legal right to assemble, unionize, or petition the government for increased pay or decreased hours, the July Monarchy under Perier, Mole, and Guizot generally proved detrimental to the lower classes. In fact, Guizot’s advice to those who were disenfranchised by the tax-based electoral requirements was a simple “enrichessez-vous” – get rich.


  Results from FactBites:
 
Dukes of Orleans - LoveToKnow 1911 (269 words)
The second duke of Orleans, created in 1392, was Louis, a younger son of Charles V., whose heir was his son, the poet Charles of Orleans.
Two distinguished families are descended from the first house of Orleans: the counts of Angouleme, who were descended from John, a son of Duke Louis I., and who furnished France with a king in the person of Francis I.; and the counts.
In addition to the dukes of Orleans the most important members of this family are: Anne Marie Louise, duchess of Montpensier;.
Henri Eugene Philippe Louis d'Orleans, duc d'Aumale - LoveToKnow 1911 (483 words)
HENRI EUGENE PHILIPPE LOUIS D'ORLEANS, AUMALE Due D' (1822-1897), French prince and statesman, fifth son of Louis Philippe, duke of Orleans, afterwards king of the French, and of Marie Amelie, princess of the Two Sicilies, was born at Paris on the 16th of January 1822.
He distinguished himself during the conquest of Algeria, and was appointed governor of that colony, in which capacity he received the submission of the amir Abd-el-Kader.
After the revolution of 1848 he retired to England and busied himself with historical and military studies, replying in 1861 by a Letter upon the History of France to Prince Napoleon's violent attacks upon the house of Orleans.
  More results at FactBites »

 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m