FACTOID # 14: North Carolina has a larger Native American population than North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana combined.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   States A-Z   Flags   Maps   FAQ   About 
   
 
WHAT'S NEW
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Denying the correlative

The logical fallacy of denying the correlative is the opposite of the false dilemma, where an attempt is made at introducing alternatives where there are none. For example:

You say that you have shown that my client must have stolen the money, because no-one else had the opportunity to do so. But what if the money never existed?

Should it be proven that the money never existed, nobody would be sentenced of the crime of stealing it. However, assuming it's known the money was there, questioning it's existence as an alternative to whether a particular person was the thief or not is fallacious.


In determining whether this fallacy is committed, a close look at the context is required. The essence of denying the correlative is introducing a false alternative into a context that logically admits none, but this itself could be taken as a statement (outside of logic) that the context is invalid. For example:

Either all apples are green, or some apples are not green. But what about apples that are both green and red?

The first statement is logically true, but this does not exclude the possibility of questioning whether the statement is appropriate, that is, whether either of "green" or "not green" is supposed to include "green and red" apples as well. Thus denying the correlative should not be confused with questioning definitions.


A counterexample to denying the correlative would be:

You say that either Alice is taller than Bob, or Bob is taller than Alice. But what if they're the same size?

In this case, Alice and Bob being equally tall is a valid alternative, and exposes a false dilemma.


See also


  Results from FactBites:
 
Correlative-based fallacies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (181 words)
A correlative conjunction is a relationship between two statements where one must be false and the other true.
The fallacy of denying the correlative, where an attempt is made to introduce some other invalid option into what is a true correlative.
The fallacy of suppressed correlative, where the definitions of a correlative are changed so that one of the options includes the other, making one option impossible.
  More results at FactBites »

 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m