FACTOID # 19: Cheap sloppy joes: Looking for reduced-price lunches for schoolchildren? Head for Oklahoma!
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   States A-Z   Flags   Maps   FAQ   About 
   
 
WHAT'S NEW
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Comparison of 2000s fighter aircraft

This page attempts to compare the combat performance of fighter aircraft of the 2000s.


Specifically, it compares their capabilities as air superiority fighters, that is, fighting other fighter aircraft, which is generally a harder task than shooting down aircraft which are not fighters.

Contents

Aircraft included

For conciseness, this page considers only fighter aircraft manufactured in 2000 and those that are planned to be manufactured later in the decade. Older aircraft are likely to be less capable than the aircraft in this survey. Two promising Russian aircraft, the MiG-35 and Sukhoi Su-47 Berkut will also not be included, as there is not enough reliable information available about their performance and no assurance that they will ever go into service with any air force. The aircraft included are:

What makes a good fighter?

Performance

In air-to-air combat, a fighter has to get into a good position to fire its weapons at an enemy fighter. (Or at least it has had to in the past; in the future it may well be that the increased range, speed, and maneuverability of air-to-air missiles means the maneuverability of the fighter doesn't matter, and you may as well use a slow, lumbering passenger jet as your missile carrier).


If a fighter can turn faster than its opponent, it will find it easier to get into a good position, for example behind its opponent. If a fighter has high speed and great acceleration, it will be able to choose whether or not to engage a less capable opponent. It will also have more chance of outmaneuvering or outrunning a missile that is locked on to it.


When aircraft turn, such as when they perform high-g maneuvers typical of air-to-air combat, they lose speed. The better their acceleration, the quicker they can pick up this speed again.


An aircraft's acceleration is calculated as its thrust minus its drag, divided by its mass. A good measure of comparative acceleration is a plane's thrust to weight ratio (note that if this is greater than 1, the aircraft is capable of flying vertically upwards).


An aircraft's ability to turn can be approximately gauged by its wing loading. This is the mass of the aircraft divided by the area of the wings. The bigger the wings, the easier it is for them to push the aircraft in a direction other than that it is curently travelling. Note that some aircraft use thrust vectoring, where the exhaust from the engines doesn't go straight backwards but can be tilted up or down (and sometimes also left to right). The purpose of thrust vectoring is to increase maneuverability.

Table of thrust-to-weight ratio and wing loading
Thrust/
Weight
Ratio
wing
loading
kg/mē
notes
Rafale F2 1.04 320
Typhoon 1.18 311
F-2 0.89 430
MiG-29SM 1.13 411
Su-27
Gripen 0.94 341
F/A-22 1.27 320 max takeoff wt; thrust vectoring
F-35A 0.83 446


Notes:

  • values are at normal takeoff weight unless otherwise specified

Logistics

It is a truism that "amateurs talk about tactics, dilettantes talk about strategy, professionals talk about logistics". The best fighter in the world is useless unless it is available where it is wanted, when it is wanted.


Cost and Availability

The more an aircraft costs to buy, the fewer units of it can be afforded and vice versa as contractors decide to charge more for lower quantities. Another aspect of availability is that some exporting nations limit who they will sell aircraft to for political motives. Generally, the USA tends to be the most fussy about who it will sell to, and Russia and China the least fussy. Information about aircraft costs is hard to get hold of. Because of inflation, one must also include the year that a cost refers to; figures are in USD unless otherwise specified.

  • Rafale
  • Typhoon Austrian version: '03 € 62m
  • Mitsubishi F-2 US$ 100m
  • MiG-29 about '98 US$ 27m
  • Sukhoi Su-27US$ 24m
  • Sukhoi Su-30 US$ ~38m (Several variants)
    • Sukhoi Su-30K for Indonesia: '98 US$ 33m
    • Sukhoi Su-30MKI for India, highly specified version: '98 US$ 45m
  • Gripen about '98 US$ 25m
  • Ching Kuo initially large order put cost per unit at US$ 24m
  • F-15 '98 US$ 43m
  • F-16 late models about '98 US$ 25m
  • F-18 E/F model '98 US$ 60m
  • F/A-22 '03 US$ 152m, based on production run of 276 aircraft costing US$ 42bn
  • F-35 planned costs, based on version, in '94:
    • F-35A US$ 28m
    • F-35B US$ 35m
    • F-35C US$ 38m

Range and runways

range,
int fuel
km
range,
ext fuel
km
ferry
range
km
takeoff,
landing
m
notes
Rafale F2  ? 1850  ? 400, 300
Typhoon  ? 1389 3706  ?, ?
F-2  ? 834  ?  ?, ?
Gripen  ? 834  ? 400, 500
F/A-22  ?  ?  ?  ?, ?
F-35A 1000?  ?  ?  ?, ?
F-35B 1000?  ?  ?  ?, 0 STOVL
F-35C 1000?  ?  ? carrier


Notes:

  • explanations of the columns, in order:
    • the range the aircraft can travel to, on a typical air superiority mission, with 10 minutes loiter over the target, using only internal fuel, travelling at high altitude (which conserves fuel), returning to its airbase after the mission
    • the same, using external fuel (drop tanks) as well
    • the range the aircraft can travel when moving to a different airbase
    • the length of runway the aircraft needs to take off and land

Servicing

How many hours of servicing does the aircraft require per hour of flight?


DERA study

Britain's Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (now split into QinetiQ and DSTL) did an operational evaluation comparing the Typhoon with some other modern fighters in how well they performed against an expected adversary aircraft, the Sukhoi Su-35. Due to the lack of information gathered on the 5th generation combat aircraft and the Su-35 during the time of this study it is not meant to be considered official.


The study used real pilots flying the JOUST system of networked simulators. Various western aircraft were put in simulated combat against the Su-35. The results were:

Aircraft Odds vs.
Su-35
Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptor 10.1:1
Eurofighter Typhoon 4.5:1
Dassault-Breguet Rafale C 1.0:1
Sukhoi Su-35 'Flanker' 1.0:1
McDonnell Douglas F-15C Eagle 0.8:1
Boeing F/A-18+ 0.4:1
McDonnell Douglas F/A-18C 0.3:1
General Dynamics F-16C 0.3:1

These results mean, for example, that in simulated combat, 4.5 Su-35s were shot down for every Typhoon lost.


The "F/A-18+" in the study was apparently not the current F/A-18E/F, but an improved version. All the western aircraft in the simulation were using the AMRAAM missile, except the Rafale which was using the MICA missile.


One must bear in mind that the full details of the simulation have not been released, making it hard to verify whether it gives an accurate evaluation of the capabilities of these aircraft (for instance, whether they had adequate knowledge of the Sukhoi and Raptor to realistically simulate their combat performance).


Combat performance

Combat performance is often down to pilot training rather than aircraft capabilities. A list of all combats involving these aircraft:

  • During the 1991 Gulf War, USAF F-15s shot down 5 Iraqi MiG-29s
  • On January 17, 1993, a USAF F-16 shot down a MiG-29 in Iraqi no-fly zone. (Some sources claim it was a MiG-23.)
  • In February 1999, Ethiopian Su-27s (believed flown by Ukrainians) shot down 2 Eritrean MiG-29s (believed flown by Russians)
  • During the 1999 Kosovo War, a Netherlands F-16 shot down 1 Yugoslavian MiG-29; USAF F-15s shot down 4 MiG-29s

Further reading

  • Fighter "non-comparison" table (http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/aviation/text/fighters/fighters.html) - compares fighters, and contains links to other aviation topics
  • aeronautics.ru (http://www.aeronautics.ru/nws002/military_aircraft_prices.htm) showing estimated aircraft prices
  • StrategyPage report on F-15 vs. Su-35 comparison (http://www.strategypage.com//fyeo/howtomakewar/default.asp?target=HTMURPH.HTM)

  Results from FactBites:
 
DJ->Defence Notes (4020 words)
Initial utility of aircraft during WW I was restricted to that of an observation platform and in the reconnaissance role over the battlefield and as the performance of the earlier flying machines improved air power began to assert itself more forcefully.
Fighter aircraft were used both in the offensive role of knocking out the adversary’s attackers and in the defensive role to protect friendly attack formations from being disrupted by enemy fighters.
Their ability to distinguish aircraft from the ground clutter when the attackers approached at a low altitude was limited – in fact non-existent in the early versions of the radars.
NodeWorks - Encyclopedia: Fighter aircraft (1050 words)
A fighter aircraft is a military aircraft designed primarily for attacking other aircraft, as opposed to a bomber, which is designed to attack ground targets, primarily by dropping bombs.
Fighters are comparatively small, fast, and highly maneuverable, and have been fitted with increasingly sophisticated tracking and weapons systems to intercept and attack other aircraft.
Fighter aircraft were developed during World War I, when they were tasked with hunting down enemy reconnaissance aircraft and balloons.
  More results at FactBites »

 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m