The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle is a collection of (mainly) secondary source documents narrating the history of the Anglo-Saxons and their settlement in Britain. Much of the information in these documents consists of rumours of events that happened elsewhere and so may be unreliable. However for some periods and places, the Chronicle is the only substantial surviving source of information. The manuscripts were produced in different places, and each manuscript represents the biases of its scribes. The Chronicles have entries spanning AD 1 to 1154 (albeit one Chronicle also has an entry - misdated - for 60 BC).
The Chronicles (there are more than one) were developed primarily as a means of remembering and recording the date. There was a widespread contemporary belief that the world would end at the millennium (AD 1000), so fixing your place relative to the end of the world was important. Annals were mainly kept at monasteries and were intensely local documents. Items important to the locals, such as the fertility of the harvest or the paucity of bees, would be eagerly recorded, wheras distant political events were largely ignored. A combination of the individual annals allows us to develop an overall picture, a document that was the first continuous history written by Europeans in their own language. Thus the Chronicles are an important development in historiography as well as a useful historical documents in their own right.
There are nine surviving manuscripts (including two copies), of which eight are written entirely in Old English, while the ninth is a mixture of Old English and Latin. One (the Peterborough Chronicle) contains early Middle English as well as Anglo-Saxon. The oldest (Corp. Chris. MS 173) is known as the Parker Chronicle, after Matthew Parker who once owned it, or the Winchester Chronicle. They are:
The Parker Chronicle (Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, MS. 173)
Cottonian Fragment (British Museum, Cotton MS. Otho B xi, 2)
The Abingdon Chronicle I (British Museum, Cotton MS. Tiberius A vi.)
The Abingdon Chronicle II (British Museum, Cotton MS. Tiberius B i.)
The Worcester Chronicle (British Museum, Cotton MS. Tiberius B iv.)
The Laud (or "Peterborough") Chronicle (Bodleian, MS. Laud 636)
The Bilingual Canterbury Epitome (British Museum, Cotton MS. Domitian A viii.) - entries in English and Latin.
Cottonian Fragment (British Museum, Cotton MS. Domitian A ix.)
An Easter Table Chronicle (British Museum, Cotton MS. Caligula A xv.)
Some think that the chronicles were originally commissioned by King Alfred, but there is no substantive evidence for this. Many of the surviving manuscripts that are together known as The Anglo-Saxon Chronicles are concerned with him, but others marginalise him, depending on the preference of the original scribe. The translated texts (together with explanatory materials) are available in books and on the Internet, so scholars at all levels can now consult them directly.
See Anglo-Saxon kingdom genealogy for a comparison of the genealogies of the Canterbury and Winchester manuscripts with the one given by Snorri Sturluson in his Edda.
Peter Hunter Blair, An Introduction to Anglo-Saxon England, pp. 352-355
The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (http://www.gutenberg.net/etext/657) at Project Gutenberg - Public domain copy.
Transcribed original text (http://www.georgetown.edu/labyrinth/library/oe/texts/asc/index.html)
Translation to English (http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/OMACL/Anglo/)
It is interesting as a stage in the transition from the vernacular to the Latinchronicle; but it has little independent value, being a mere epitome, made at Canterbury in the 11th or 12 th century, of a chronicle akin to E.
The present writer sees no reason to doubt that the idea of a national, as opposed to earlier local chronicles, was inspired by Alfred, who may even have dictated, or at least revised, the entries relating to his own campaigns; while for the earlier parts pre-existing materials, both oral and written, were utilized.
After 915 B, C insert as a separate document a short register of Mercian affairs during the same period (902-924), which might be called the acts of Æthelflaed, the famous "Lady of the Mercians," while D has incorporated it, not very skilfully, with the official continuation.
Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Want to know more? Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:
Press Releases |
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m