FACTOID # 10: The total number of state executions in 2005 was 60: 19 in Texas and 41 elsewhere. The racial split was 19 Black and 41 White.
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   States A-Z   Flags   Maps   FAQ   About 
People who viewed "Adposition" also viewed:


FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:



(* = Graphable)



Encyclopedia > Adposition

In grammar, an adposition is an element that, prototypically, combines syntactically with a phrase and indicates how that phrase should be interpreted in the surrounding context. If the location of a particular adposition is fixed with respect to its complement phrase, it may also be known as a preposition (comes before the phrase), postposition (after the phrase), or circumposition (around the phrase). In the terminology of some linguists, an adposition is called a preposition regardless of its position relative to its complement.[1] For the rules of English grammar, see English grammar and Disputes in English grammar. ... Look up phrase in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. ...

In linguistics, adpositions are considered to be members of the syntactic category "P". "PPs",[2] consisting of an adpositional head and its complement phrase, are used for a wide range of syntactic and semantic functions, most commonly modification and complementation. The following examples illustrate some uses of English prepositions: Linguistics is the scientific study of language, which can be theoretical or applied. ... A syntactic category is either a phrasal category, such as noun phrase or verb phrase, which can be decomposed into smaller syntactic categories, or a lexical category, such as noun or verb, which cannot be further decomposed. ... In linguistics, an adpositional phrase is a general term that includes prepositional phrases (which are usually found in head-first languages like English) and postpositional phrases (usually found in head-final languages like Dutch). ... In linguistics, the head is the morpheme that determines the category of a compound or the word that determines the syntactic type of the phrase of which it is a member. ...

  • modifying verbs
    • sleep throughout the winter
    • danced atop the tables for hours.
  • modifying nouns
    • the weather in April
    • cheeses from France with live bacteria
  • complementing verbs
    • insist on staying home
    • dispose of unwanted items
  • complementing nouns
    • a thirst for revenge
    • a message inside our bottle
  • complementing adjectives and adverbs
    • attentive to their needs
    • separately from its neighbors
  • complementing other adpositions
    • away from the window
    • from beneath the bed

Adpositions perform many of the same functions as case markings, but adpositions are syntactic elements, while case markings are morphological elements. In grammar, the case of a noun or pronoun indicates its grammatical function in a greater phrase or clause; such as the role of subject, of direct object, or of possessor. ...



Adpositions form a heterogeneous class, with fuzzy boundaries that tend to overlap with other categories (like verbs, nouns, and adjectives). It is thus impossible to provide an absolute definition that picks out all and only the adpositions in every language. The following properties are, however, characteristic of the most frequently used, "core" members of most adpositional systems:

  • Adpositions are among the most frequently occurring words in languages that have them. For example, one frequency ranking for English word forms[3] begins as follows (adpositions in bold):
the, of, and, to, a, in, that, it, is, was, I, for, on, you, …
  • The most common adpositions are single, monomorphemic words. According to the ranking cited above, for example, the most common English prepositions are:
of, to, in, for, on, with, as, by, at, from, …
  • An adposition combines syntactically with exactly one complement phrase, most often a noun phrase (or, in a different analysis, a determiner phrase). (In some analyses, an adposition need have no complement. See below.)
  • An adposition establishes the grammatical relationship that links its complement phrase to another word or phrase in the context.
  • An adposition determines certain grammatical properties of its complement (e.g. its case).
  • Adpositions are non-inflecting (or "invariant"); i.e., they do not have paradigms of forms (for different tenses, cases, genders, etc.) in the same way as verbs, adjectives, and nouns in the same language. [dubious ]
  • Adpositions form a closed class of lexical items and cannot be productively derived from words of other categories.

In morpheme-based morphology, a morpheme is the smallest lingual unit that carries a semantic interpretation. ... A complement is a phrase that fits a particular slot in the syntax requirements of a parent phrase. ... Look up noun phrase in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. ... In linguistics, a determiner phrase is a syntactic category, a phrase headed by a determiner. ... In grammar, the case of a noun or pronoun indicates its grammatical function in a greater phrase or clause; such as the role of subject, of direct object, or of possessor. ... In the context of linguistic morphology, an uninflected word is a word that has no morphological marks (inflection) such as affixes, Umlaut, Ablaut, consonant gradation, etc. ... In linguistics, a closed class (or closed word class) is a word class to which no new items can normally be added, and that usually contains a relatively small number of items. ...


Adpositions can be organized into subclasses according to various criteria. These can be based on directly observable properties (such as the adposition's form or its position in the sentence) or on less visible properties (such as the adposition's meaning or function in the context at hand).

Simple vs complex

Simple adpositions consist of a single word, while complex adpositions consist of a group of words that act as one unit. Some examples of complex prepositions in English are:

  • in spite of, with respect to, except for, by dint of, next to

The boundary between simple and complex adpositions is not clear-cut. Many simple adpositions are derived from complex forms (e.g. with + inwithin, by + sidebeside) through grammaticalization. This change takes time, and during the transitional stages the adposition acts in some ways like a single word, and in other ways like a multi-word unit. For example, current German orthographic conventions recognize the indeterminate status of the following adpositions, allowing two spellings:[4] Grammaticalisation, also referred to as Grammaticalization, Grammatisation or Grammatization is a theory describing the change of a content word (lexical morpheme) into a function word or grammatical affix. ...

  • anstelle / an Stelle ("instead of"), aufgrund / auf Grund ("because of"), mithilfe / mit Hilfe ("thanks to"), zugunsten / zu Gunsten ("in favor of"), zuungunsten / zu Ungunsten ("to the disadvantage of"), zulasten / zu Lasten ("at the expense of")

The boundary between complex adpositions and free combinations of words is also a fuzzy one. For English, this involves structures of the form "preposition + (article) + noun + preposition". Many sequences in English, such as in front of, that are traditionally regarded as prepositional phrases are not so regarded by linguists.[5] The following characteristics are good indications that a given combination is "frozen" enough to be considered a complex preposition in English:

  • It contains a word that cannot be used in any other context: by dint of, in lieu of.
  • The first preposition cannot be replaced: with a view to but not *for/without a view to
  • It is impossible to insert an article, or to use a different article: *on an/the account of, for the/*a sake of
  • The range of possible adjectives is very limited: in great favor of, but not *in helpful favor of
  • The number of the noun cannot be changed: by virtue/*virtues of
  • It is impossible to use a possessive determiner: in spite of him, not *in his spite

Complex prepositions develop through the grammaticalization of commonly-used free combinations. This is an ongoing process that introduces new prepositions into English.[6]

Classification by position

The surface position of an adposition with respect to its complement allows us to define the following subclasses:

  • A preposition precedes its complement to form a prepositional phrase.
German: auf dem Tisch, French: sur la table, Polish: na stole ("on the table")
  • A postposition follows its complement to form a postpositional phrase.
Mandarin: 桌子 zhuōzi shàng (lit. "table on"), Hungarian: az asztalon (lit. "the table on")

These two terms are in fact much more commonly used than the more general adposition. Whether a language has primarily prepositions or postpositions is seen as an important aspect of its typological classification, correlated with many other properties of the language according to research into linguistic universals. Standard Mandarin, also known as Modern Standard Chinese, is the official modern Chinese spoken language used by the Peoples Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), and is one of the four official languages of Singapore. ... Linguistic typology is the typology that classifies languages by their features. ... A linguistic universal is a statement that is true for all natural languages. ...

It is usually straightforward to say whether an adposition precedes or follows its complement, but in some cases, the complement may not appear in its "normal" position. For example, in preposition stranding constructions, the complement appears somewhere to the left of the preposition: Preposition stranding, sometimes called P-stranding, is the syntactic construction in which a preposition appears without an object. ...

  • {How much money} did you say the guy wanted to sell us the car for?
  • She's going to the Bahamas? {Who} with?

In other cases, the complement of the adposition is missing altogether:

  • I'm going to the park. Do you want to come with?
  • French: Il fait trop froid, je ne suis pas habillée pour. ("It's too cold, I'm not dressed for [this situation].")

The adpositions in these examples are generally still considered to be prepositions, because when they form a phrase with the complement (in more ordinary constructions), they must appear first.

Some adpositions can in fact appear on either side of their complement; these might be called ambipositions (Libert 2006):

  • He slept {through the whole night}/{the whole night through}.
  • German: {meiner Meinung nach}/{nach meiner Meinung} ("in my opinion")

Another logical possibility is for the adposition to appear on both sides of its complement:

  • A circumposition has two parts, which surround the complement to form a circumpositional phrase.
    • English: from then on
    • Dutch: naar het einde toe ("to the end", lit. "to the end to")
    • Mandarin: cóng bīngxīang ("from out of the refrigerator", lit. "from refrigerator inside")
    • French: à un détail près ("except for one detail", lit. "at one detail near")

"Circumposition" can be useful as a descriptive term, although on closer inspection, most circumpositional phrases can be broken down into a more hierarchical structure, or given a different analysis altogether. For example, the Mandarin example above could be analyzed as a prepositional phrase headed by cóng ("from"), taking the postpositional phrase bīngxīang lǐ ("refrigerator inside") as its complement. Alternatively, the cóng may be analyzed as not being a preposition at all (see the section below regarding coverbs). Standard Mandarin, also known as Modern Standard Chinese, is the official modern Chinese spoken language used by the Peoples Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), and is one of the four official languages of Singapore. ...

Melis (2003) proposes the descriptive term interposition for adpositions in the structures such as the following:

  • mot à mot ("word for word"), coup sur coup ("one after another, repeatedly"), page après page ("page upon page")

These phrases do require special attention, but the term "interposition" cannot be taken literally to mean that the adposition appears inside its complement (because the two nouns do not form a single phrase *mot mot or *page page). Genuine examples of "interposed" adpositions can be found in Latin (e.g. summa cum laude, lit. "highest with praise"), but these are always related to a more basic prepositional structure.

Classification by complement

Although noun phrases are the most typical complements, adpositions can in fact combine with a variety of syntactic categories, much like verbs.

  • noun phrases: It was on {the table}.
  • adpositional phrases: Come out from {under the bed}.
  • adjectives and adjective phrases: The scene went from {blindingly bright} to {pitch black}.
  • adverb or adverb phrases: I worked there until recently
  • infinitival or participial verb phrases: Let's think about solving this problem.
  • interrogative clauses: we can't agree on {whether to have children or not}
  • full sentences (see Conjunctions below)

Also like verbs, adpositions can appear without a complement; see Adverbs below.

Some adpositions could be described as combining with two complements:

  • {With Sammy president}, we can all come out of hiding again.
  • {For Sammy to become president}, they'd have to seriously modify the Constitution.

It is more commonly assumed, however, that Sammy and the following predicate first forms a small clause, which then becomes the single complement of the preposition. Small clauses are minimal predicate structures: they possess arguments and predicates but no tense. ...

Semantic classification

Adpositions can be used to express a wide range of semantic relations between their complement and the rest of the context. The following list is not an exhaustive classification:

  • spatial relations: location (inclusion, exclusion, proximity), direction (origin, path, endpoint)
  • temporal relations
  • comparison: equality, opposition, price, rate
  • content: source, material, subject matter
  • instrument, manner
  • cause, purpose, agent

Most common adpositions are highly polysemous, and much research is devoted to the description and explanation of the various interconnected meanings of particular adpositions. In many cases a primary, spatial meaning can be identified, which is then extended to non-spatial uses by metaphorical or other processes. Polysemy (from the Greek πολυσημεία = multiple meaning) is the capacity for a sign to have multiple meanings. ...

In some contexts, adpositions appear in contexts where their semantic contribution is minimal, perhaps altogether absent. Such adpositions are sometimes referred to as functional or case-marking adpositions, and they are lexically selected by another element in the construction, or fixed by the construction as a whole.

  • English: dispense with formalities, listen to my advice, good at mathematics
  • Russian: otvechat' na vopros (lit. "answer on the question"), obvinenie v obmane ("accusation in [i.e. of] fraud")
  • Spanish: soñar con ganar el título ("dream with [i.e. about] winning the title"), consistir en dos grupos ("consist in [i.e. of] two groups")

It is usually possible to find some semantic motivation for the choice of a given adposition, but it is generally impossible to explain why other semantically motivated adpositions are excluded in the same context. The selection of the correct adposition in these cases is a matter of syntactic well-formedness.

Subclasses of spatial adpositions

Spatial adpositions can be divided into two main classes, namely directional and static ones. A directional adposition usually involves motion along a path over time, but can also denote a non-temporal path. Examples of directional adpositions include to, from, towards, into, along and through.

  • Bob went to the store. (movement over time)
  • a path into the woods (non-temporal path)
  • The fog extended from London to Paris (non-temporal path)

A static adposition normally does not involve movement. Examples of these include at, in, on, beside, behind, under and above.

  • Bob is at the store.

Directional adpositions differ from static ones in that they normally can't combine with a copula to yield a predicate, though there are some exceptions to this, as in Bob is from Australia, which may perhaps be thought of as special uses. For other uses, see Copula (disambiguation). ... In traditional grammar, a predicate is one of the two main parts of a sentence (the other being the subject, which the predicate modifies). ...

  • Fine: Bob is in his bedroom. (in is static)
  • Bad: *Bob is to his bedroom. (into is directional)

Directional spatial adpositions can only combine with verbs that involve motion; static prepositions can combine with other verbs as well.

  • Fine: Bob is lying down in his bedroom.
  • Bad: *Bob is lying down into/from his bedroom.

When a static adposition combines with a motion verb, it sometimes takes on a directional meaning. The following sentence can either mean that Bob jumped around in the water, or else that he jumped so that he ended up in the water.

  • Bob jumped in the water.

In some languages, such as German and Czech, directional adpositions govern a different case on their complement than static ones. For example, in German, directional adpositions govern accusative while static ones govern dative. Adpositions that are ambiguous between directional and static interpretations govern accusative when they are interpreted as directional, and dative when they are interpreted as static. In linguistics, declension is a feature of inflected languages: generally, the alteration of a noun to indicate its grammatical role. ... A complement is a phrase that fits a particular slot in the syntax requirements of a parent phrase. ... The term accusative may be used in the following contexts: A form of morphosyntactic alignment, as found in nominative-accusative languages. ... Dative has several meanings. ...

  • in seinem Zimmer (in his-DATIVE room) "in his room" (static)
  • in sein Zimmer (in his-ACCUSATIVE room) "into his room" (directional)

Directional adpositions can be further divided into telic ones and atelic ones. To, into and across are telic: they involve movement all the way to the endpoint denoted by their complement. Atelic ones include towards and along. When telic adpositions combine with a motion verb, the result is a telic verb phrase. Atelic adpositions give rise to atelic verb phrases when so combined.[7] Telic, i. ... Telic, i. ... A complement is a phrase that fits a particular slot in the syntax requirements of a parent phrase. ... Telic, i. ... In linguistics, a verb phrase or VP is a syntactic structure composed of the predicative elements of a sentence and functions in providing information about the subject of the sentence. ...

Static adpositions can be further subdivided into projective and non-projective ones. A non-projective static adposition is one whose meaning can be determined by inspecting the meaning of its complement and the meaning of the preposition itself. A projective static adposition requires, in addition, a perspective or point of view. If I say that Bob is behind the rock you need to know where I am in order to know on which side of the rock Bob is supposed to be. If I say that your pen is to the left of my book you also need to know what my point of view is. No such point of view is required in the interpretation of sentences like your pen is on the desk. Projective static prepositions can sometimes take the complement itself as "point of view," if this provides us with certain information. For example, a house normally has a front and a back, so a sentence like the following is actually ambiguous between two readings: one has it that Bob is at the back of the house; the other has it that Bob is on the other side of the house, with respect to the speaker's point of view.

  • Bob is behind the house.

A similar effect can be observed with left of, given that objects that have fronts and backs can also be ascribed lefts and rights. The sentence, My keys are to the left of the phone, can either mean that they are on the speaker's left of the phone, or on the phone's left of the phone.[8]

      • also creates the proper noun
      • makes a wonderful derived unfixed image of an answer mabe by the original music of

important word marked by distinction over time

Classification by grammatical function

Particular uses of adpositions can be classified according to the function of the adpositional phrase in the sentence.

  • Modification
    • adverb-like
    • adjective-like
  • Syntactic functions
    • complement
    • subject (impossible in many languages)
{In the cellar} was chosen as the best place to hide the bodies.

Adpositional languages typically single out a particular adposition for the following special functions:

  • marking possession
  • marking the agent in the passive construction
  • marking the beneficiary role in transfer relations
  • marking of the phrase of that important message given by the prposition

Look up Possession in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. ... In grammar, the voice of a verb describes the relationship between the action (or state) that the verb expresses and the participants identified by its arguments (subject, object, etc. ...

Overlaps with other categories


We observe many similarities in form between adpositions and adverbs. Some adverbs are transparently derived from the fusion of a preposition and its complement, and some prepositions have adverb-like uses with no complement: “Adverbs” redirects here. ...

  • {down the stairs}/downstairs, {under the ground}/underground.
  • {inside (the house)}, {aboard (the plane)}, {underneath (the surface)}

It is possible to treat all of these adverbs as intransitive prepositions, as opposed to transitive prepositions, which select a complement (just like transitive vs intransitive verbs). This analysis[9] could also be extended to other adverbs, even those that cannot be used as "ordinary" prepositions with a nominal complement:

  • here, there, abroad, downtown, astray, …
  • today, tomorrow, yesterday, soon, afterwards, someday, …
  • recently, carefully, honestly, …

A more conservative approach is to say simply that adverbs and adpositional phrases share many common functions.

Phrasal verbs in English are composed of a verb and a "particle" that also looks like an intransitive preposition. The same can be said for the separable verb prefixes found in Dutch (and German). In linguistics, the term particle is often employed as a useful catch-all lacking a strict definition. ...

  • give up, look out, sleep in, carry on, come to
  • Dutch: opbellen ("call up"), aanbieden ("offer"), voorstellen ("present")

Although these elements have the same lexical form as prepositions, in many cases they do not have relational semantics, and there is no "missing" complement whose identity can be recovered from the context.


The set of adpositions overlaps with the set of subordinating conjunctions (or complementizers): A complementizer, as used in linguistics (especially generative grammar), is a syntactic category (part of speech), roughly equivalent to the term subordinating conjunction in traditional linguistics. ...

  • (preposition) before/after/since the end of the summer
  • (conjunction) before/after/since the summer ended
  • It looks like another rainy day (preposition) / it's going to rain again today (conjunction).

All of these words can be treated as prepositions if we extend the definition to allow clausal complements. This treatment could be extended further to conjunctions that are never used as ordinary prepositions:

  • unless they surrender, although time is almost up, while you were on the phone


In some languages, the role of adpositions is served by coverbs, words that are lexically verbs, but are generally used to convey the meaning of adpositions. Wikipedia does not yet have an article with this exact name. ...

For instance, whether prepositions exist in Chinese is sometimes considered an open question. Coverbs are often referred to as prepositions because they appear before the noun phrase they modify. However, unlike prepositions, coverbs can sometimes stand alone as main verbs. For instance, in Standard Mandarin, dào can be used in a prepositional or a verb sense: Standard Mandarin, also known as Modern Standard Chinese, is the official modern Chinese spoken language used by the Peoples Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), and is one of the four official languages of Singapore. ...

  • ("to travel") is the main verb: dào Běijīng qù. ("I travel to Beijing.")
  • dào ("to arrive") is the main verb: dào le. ("I have arrived.")

Case affixes

From a functional point of view, adpositions and morphological case markings are strikingly similar. An adpositional phrase in one language often corresponds directly to a case-marked noun phrase in another language. For example, the agentive noun phrase in the passive construction in English is introduced by the preposition by, while in Russian it is marked by the instrumental case. Sometimes this can be observed within a single language. For example, in certain uses the genitive case in German is interchangeable with a von prepositional phrase.

Despite this functional similarity, adpositions and case markings are distinct grammatical categories:

  • Adpositions combine syntactically with their complement phrase. Case markings combine with a noun morphologically.
  • Two adpositions can usually be joined with a conjunction and share a single complement, but this is normally not possible with case markings:
{of and for the people} vs. Latin populi et populo, not *populi et -o ("people-genitive and -dative")
  • One adposition can usually combine with two coordinated complements, but this is normally not possible with case markings:
of {the city and the world} vs. Latin urbis et orbis, not *urb- et orbis ("city and world-genitive")
  • Case markings combine primarily with nouns, whereas adpositions can combine with phrases of many different categories.
  • A case marking usually appears directly on the noun, but an adposition can be separated from the noun by other words.
  • Within the noun phrase, determiners and adjectives may agree with the noun in case (case spreading), but an adposition only appears once.
  • A language can have hundreds of adpositions (including complex adpositions), but no language has this many distinct morphological cases.

Still, it can be difficult to draw a clear boundary between case markings and adpositions. For example, the post-nominal elements in Japanese and Korean are sometimes called case particles and sometimes postpositions. Sometimes they are analysed as two different groups because they have different characteristics (e.g. ability to combine with focus particles), but in such analysis, it is unclear which words should fall into which group. Latin was the language originally spoken in the region around Rome called Latium. ... Latin was the language originally spoken in the region around Rome called Latium. ...

  • Japanese: 電車 (densha de, "by train")
  • Korean: 한국 (Hangug-e, "to Korea")

Turkish and Finnish have both extensive case-marking and postpositions, and here there is evidence to help distinguish the two:

  • Turkish: (case) sinemaya (cinema-dative, "to the cinema") vs (postposition) sinema için ("for the cinema")
  • Finnish: (case) talossa (house-inessive, "in the house") vs (postposition) "talon edessä (house-gen in-front, "in front of the house")

In these examples, the case markings form a word with their hosts (as shown by vowel harmony, other word-internal effects and agreement of adjectives in Finnish), while the postpositions are independent words. Vowel harmony (also metaphony) is a type of long-distance assimilatory phonological process involving vowels. ...

Word choice

In ambiguous cases, there is not always a clear rule which adposition is appropriate, and different languages and regional dialects may have different conventions. Learning the conventionally preferred word is a matter of exposure to examples. For example, most dialects of American English have "to wait in line", but some have "to wait on line". For other uses, see American English (disambiguation). ...


  1. ^ An example is Huddleston and Pullum, The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (below, CGEL), whose choice of terms is discussed on p.602.
  2. ^ Although seemingly appropriate, the term adpositional phrase is little used. CGEL, p.602.
  3. ^ WordCount website
  4. ^ http://www.duden.de/index2.html?neue_rechtschreibung/neuregelung/trennung.html
  5. ^ CGEL, pp.62-–23; Pullum, "Phrasal Prepositions in a Civil Tone".
  6. ^ Quirk and Mulholland, 1964.
  7. ^ Zwarts, Joost. 2005. "Prepositional Aspect and the Algebra of Paths." Linguistics and Philosophy 28.6, 739-779.
  8. ^ Creswell, Max. 1978. "Prepositions and points of view." Linguistics and Philosophy, 2: 1-41.
  9. ^ Notably that of CGEL, pp.612–16.
  • Bennett, David C. (1975) Spatial and Temporal Uses of English Prepositions: An Essay in Stratificational Semantics. London: Longman.
  • Emonds, Joseph E. (1985) A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-43146-8.
  • Jackendoff, Ray S. (1973) "Base Rules for PPs". In S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, pp. 345–356. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Koopman, Hilda. (2000) "Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles". In The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads, pp. 204–260. London: Routledge.
  • Libert, Alan R. (2006) Ambipositions. LINCOM studies in language typology (No. 13). LINCOM. ISBN 3-89586-747-0.
  • Maling, Joan. (1983) "Transitive adjectives: A case of categorial reanalysis". In F. Heny and B. Richards (eds), Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, Vol. 1, pp. 253–289. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Melis, Ludo. (2003) La préposition en français. Gap: Ophrys.
  • Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2005) "http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001871.html Phrasal Prepositions in a Civil Tone." Language Log. Accessed 9 September 2007.
  • Quirk, Randolph, and Joan Mulholland. (1964) "Complex Prepositions and Related Sequences". English Studies, suppl. to vol. 45, pp. 64–73.
  • Rauh, Gisa. (1991) Approaches to Prepositions. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

is the 252nd day of the year (253rd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era in the 21st Century. ...

See also

Look up adposition, preposition, postposition, circumposition in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

  Results from FactBites:
Reference.com/Encyclopedia/Adposition (3178 words)
Adpositional phrases (or "PPs", consisting of an adpositional head and its complement phrase) are used for a wide range of syntactic and semantic functions, most commonly modification and complementation.
Adpositions perform many of the same functions as case markings, but adpositions are syntactic elements, while case markings are morphological elements.
Adpositions are non-inflecting (or "invariant"); i.e., they do not have paradigms of forms (for different tenses, cases, genders, etc.) in the same way as verbs, adjectives, and nouns in the same language.
Adposition - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (1007 words)
In grammar, an adposition is any of a wide variety of particles and affixes which are attached to a noun phrase (their object) in order to modify the noun phrase or show its relation to another concept or situation in the same clause.
Adpositions are classified by their placement relative to their object; the most common kinds of adpositions are prepositions, which precede their object, and postpositions, which follow them.
Adpositions are very often used to form adverbials, particularly in Germanic languages, such as English.
  More results at FactBites »



Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:


Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m